1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1406 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
M. SHASHIDHARA @ SHASHI,
S/O MUNIRAJU,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT NEAR MANDAR SCHOOL,
DODDA BIDARAKALLU,
8TH MAILIKALLU,
BENGALURU.
2.
SRI. ABHISHEK @ ABHI,
S/O KENCHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
R/AT NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE,
2ND CROSS, NELAGADARANAHALLI,
8TH MAILIKALLU,
BENGALURU.
PERMANENT RESIDENT OF TADAKALUR,
HULIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT 3 572 113.
&PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.SURESH M CHARAMAGOL, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY: JAYANAGARA POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE 3 560 001.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.RAHUL RAI K., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER
ON BAIL IN CR.NO.86/2021 OF JAYANAGARA P.S.,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 392 OF
IPC ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED IV ADLD.CIVIL JUDGE
(JR.DN) AND 5TH J.M.F.C AT TUMAKUR.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Heard Sri.Suresh M.Charamagol, learned counsel for
the petitioners and learned High Court Government Pleader
for the respondent-State and perused the records.
2.
The present petition is filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C.
3.
It is submitted that the present petitioners are
not arrested in Crime No.86/2021. However, the petitioners
3
are facing trial in another Crime No.87/2021 by New
Extension Police Station, Tumakuru.
4.
It is contended that the present petitioners have
been produced before the trial Court in this case under the
pretext of body warrant (Production of body warrant as is
contemplated under Section 267 Cr.P.C.,) which reads as
under:
267. Power to require attendance of
prisoners.
(1) Whenever, in the course of an inquiry,
trial or other proceeding under this Code, it
appears to a Criminal Court,-
(a) that a person confined or detained in
a prison should be brought before the Court for
answering to a charge of an offence, or for the
purpose of any proceedings against him, or
(b) that it is necessary for the ends of
justice to examine such person as a witness,
the Court may make an order requiring the
officer in charge of the prison to produce such
person before the Court for answering to the
charge or for the purpose of such proceeding or,
as the case may be, for giving evidence.
4
(2) Where an order under sub- section (1)
is made by a Magistrate of the second class, it
shall not be forwarded to, or acted upon by, the
officer in charge of the prison unless it is
countersigned by the Chief Judicial Magistrate
to whom such Magistrate is subordinate.
(3)
Every
order
submitted
for
countersigning under sub- section (2) shall be
accompanied by a statement of the facts
which, in the opinion of Magistrate, render the
order necessary,
and
the Chief Judicial
Magistrate to whom it is submitted may, after
considering
such
statement,
decline
to
countersign the order.
5.
Section 439 Cr.P.C reads as under:
439. Special powers of High Court or
Court of Session regarding bail.
(1) A High Court or Court of Session may
direct-
(a) that any person accused of an offence
and in custody be released on bail, and if the
offence is of the nature specified in subsection
(3) of section 437, may impose any condition
which it considers necessary for the purposes
mentioned in that sub- section;
5
(b) that any condition imposed by a
Magistrate when releasing an person on bail be
set aside or modified: Provided that the High
Court or the Court of Session shall, before
granting bail to a person who is accused of an
offence which is triable exclusively by the
Court of Session or which, though not so
triable, is punishable with imprisonment for
life, give notice of the application for bail to the
Public Prosecutor unless it is, for reasons to be
recorded in writing, of opinion that it is not
practicable to give such notice.
(2) A High Court or Court of Session may
direct that any person who has been released
on bail under this Chapter be arrested and
commit him to custody.
6.
On conjoint reading of both the provisions, it is
crystal clear that, to entertain the petition under Section 439
Cr.P.C, a person must be arrested and detained in the
custody is a sine qua non factor.
7.
Since, there is no formal arrest in the case on
hand and the present petitioners are detained under the
6
pretext of body warrant issued under Section 267 Cr.P.C,
with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate
application, the present petition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
GH
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.