SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 55395

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

WRIT PETITION No.2374 OF 2022 (LB - BMP)

BETWEEN:

1. SRI V MOHAMED SHAFIULLA

S/O LATE ABDUL WAHEED

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

NO.80 ZAREENA MANZIL

NAGAVARAPALYA

C V RAMAN NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 093

2. SRI SURESH SALARIYA

S/O LATE K C SALARIYA

AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS

NO.12/1 VERSOVA LAYOUT

C V RAMAN NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 093

3. SRI S MOHAMED SAMADH

S/O V MOHAMED SHAFIULLA

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

NO.80 ZAREENA MANZIL

NAGAVARAPALYA

C V RAMAN NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 093

4. SRI AMIT SALARIYA

S/O SUBHASH SALARIYA

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

NO.12/1 VERSOVA LAYOUT

C V RAMAN NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 093.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI.UMA SHANKAR M.N., ADVOCATE)

2

AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE

BENGALURU 560 002

2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE

EAST ZONE, BENGALURU 560 002

3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

(STORM WATER DRAIN) -EAST DIVISION

EAST DIVISION-C V RAMAN NAGAR

9TH FLOOR JAYANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX

4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR

BENGALURU 560 011.

...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.P. CHIDANANDA ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES

226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO TAKE ANY FORCIBLE

OR COERCIVE STEPS TO DISPOSSESS THE PETITIONERS

FROM THEIR LAND MEASURING 750 SFT IN HL NO.125

AND 126, NAGAVARAPALYA, BENNIGANAHALLI DHAKALE,

K.R.PURAM

HOBLI,

BENGALURU

EAST

TLUK,

THEN

BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,NOW KAGGADASAPURA MAIN

ROAD,

C

V

RAMAN

NAGAR,

BENGALURU

560093

(HEREINAFTER REFERRED AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY)

IN FORMING STORM WATER DRAIN EXCEPT IN DUE

PROCESS OF LAW, AS THE PETITIONERS HAVE NO

OBJECTION FOR THE FORMATION OF STORM WATER

DRAIN IN FRONT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY TO THE

EXTENT OF 6 FEET OR MAXIMUM 8 FEET WIDTH. AND

ETC.,

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING IN 8B9 GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING:

3

This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to

respondents not to take any forcible or coercive steps to

dispossess the petitioners from their land measuring 750

sq.ft.

in

HL

No.125

and

126,

Nagavarapalya,

Benniganahalli Dakhale, K.R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East

Taluk in forming storm water drain without following the

due process of law.

2.

The petitioners and respondents have filed a

compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of

Civil Procedure stating that the parties amicably settled the

dispute among themselves and terms and conditions

contained in the compromise petition reads as under:

(i)

"The Petitioners have voluntarily and happily

surrendered 2-3 x 70 feet out of 750 SFT for

the formation of storm water drain. The

Petitioners have given their consent to the

respondents to take the possession of 2-3 x 70

feet for purpose of formation of storm water

drain running from Kaggadasapura Main Road

to Kaggadasapura Lake. It is submitted that

the respondents have also agreed to take

possession of 2-3 X 70 feet of land out of 750

SFT land and they have also undertake that

the said portion of land i.e., 2-3 X 70 feet shall

be utilised only for the formation of storm

water drain and not for any other purpose and

4

the Respondents further undertake that they

will not disturb the remaining portion of the

land and also undertake that they will not

interfere in Petitioners peaceful possession and

enjoyment of the remaining portion of the land

i.e., 750 SFT - (minus) 2-3 X 70 feet.

(ii)

The petitioners have voluntarily and happily

undertake

that

they

will

not

claim

any

compensation in respect of surrendered land

i.e., 2-3 X 70 feet and as the same is required

for the public purpose.

(iii)

The Petitioners and Respondents represented

by

the

Respondent

No.3

i.e.,

Assistant

Executive Engineer had a joint inspection of

the Schedule Property on 26.07.2022 and the

petitioners have already surrendered 2-3 X 70

feet to the respondents for the purpose of

forming storm water drain.

(iv)

The Respondents have undertaken that they

will not acquire any further portion of suit

schedule property in future as the Petitioners

have already surrendered 2-3 X 70 feet in the

suit schedule property for the formation of

storm

water

drain

without

claiming

compensation."

3.

Hence, this writ petition is disposed of in terms

of the settlement arrived between the parties and

accordingly the respondents are hereby restrained from

acquiring any further portion of the schedule property in

future as the petitioners herein already surrendered 2-3 X

5

70 feet in the schedule property for the formation of storm

water drain without claiming compensation.

Sd/-

JUDGE

BVK

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top