HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
G.K.LOKESH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against conviction based on insufficient evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution presented a weak case with unreliable witnesses. (Para 5 , 10) |
| 3. credibility of the victim's testimony is essential for conviction. (Para 19 , 28 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
Assailing the judgment and order dated 09.01.2018 passed by the Court of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, at Madikeri, in S.C.No.37/2014 convicting and sentencing the accused/appellant for offences punishable under Sections 506 and 376 of IPC and Section 3 read with Section 25 (1B) of the Arms Act, 1959 , the accused has preferred this appeal.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for appellant, the learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent/State and perused the material on record.
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are as under:
The victim/first informant (PW-1) is a resident of Garwale village in Somwarpet taluk, Kodagu district. Accused was sending messages from his mobile phone to the mobile phone of the victim. Initially, he used to send decent messages to her. Thereafter, he started sending vulgar messages. He got deleted the messages sent by him and preserved the messages
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.