B N NANDAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE BRANCH MANAGER – Respondent
The appeal is filed challenging the judgment and
award dated 12.07.2013 passed in MVC No.994/2009 on
the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and MACT,
Tumkur.
2.
In this case, the accident in-question took
place on 10.01.2006 and the appellant/petitioner himself
was driving his car bearing Reg.No.KA-21/5522 and the
vehicle was damaged due to the accident. There is no
dispute that the vehicle is covered under the package
policy. After the accident, the petitioner made a claim for
vehicle damage before the insurance company submitting
the bills. The Insurance Company has paid Rs.1,07,474/-
and disallowed claim for Rs.69,327/- for want of bills.
3. The petitioner has filed a claim petition under
Section 166 of Indian Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. The Insurer
took a stand that the petition filed under Section 166 of
IMV Act is not maintainable by the owner-insured of the
vehicle. The Tribunal held that the petition itself is not
3
maintainable and rejected the petition on the ground that
the petition filed under Section 166 of the M.V. Act is not
maintainable by the owner of the vehicle against the
insurer in respect of damage caused to the vehicle of the
owner.
4.
Learned counsel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.