SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39744

- 1 -

WP No. 1685 of 2022

C/W

WP No. 16654 of 2021

WP No. 293 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

WRIT PETITION NO. 1685 OF 2022 (GM-KSR)

C/W

WRIT PETITION NO. 16654 OF 2021 (GM-KSR)

WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2022 (GM-KSR)

IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1685 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

1.

MR.HARI YOGENDRA TRIPATHI

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

S/O RAM ASREY TRIPATHI

WLL 044, DLF WOODLAND HEIGHTS

RAJAPURA, JIGANI

BENGALURU 3 560 105.

2.

MR.SHRINIVAS BANGERA

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

S/O SANJEEVA BANGERA

FALT NO 51, 5TH FLOOR

F TOWER, DLF WOODLAND HEIGHTS

RAJAPURA, JIGANI

BENGALURU 3 560 105.

3.

MR.L.T.KUMAR

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

S/O LATE LINGACHARY

NO 22, 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS

Digitally signed by

PADMAVATHI B K

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

WP No. 1685 of 2022

C/W

WP No. 16654 of 2021

WP No. 293 of 2022

GOPALAREDDY LAYOUT

ARAKERE , BANNERGHATTA ROAD

BENGALURU 3 560 076.

ALSO AT

WLL 041, DLF WOOD LAND HEIGHTS

RAJAPURA, JIGANI

BENGALURU 3 560 105.

&PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. VITTAL B.R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION

ROOM NO.618, 6TH FLOOR

M.S.BUILDING

BENGALURU 3 560 001.

2.

THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF

CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES

BANGALORE URBAN ZONE-3

NO.146, SAHAKARA SOUDHA

8TH CROSS ROAD, 3RD MAIN

MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM

BENGALURU 3 560 003.

3.

WOODLAND HEIGHTS APARTMENT

OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (WHAOWA)

GROUND FLOOR, G-BLOCK

DLF WOODLAND HEIGHTS

RAJAPURA, JIGANI

BENGALURU 3 560 105.

- 3 -

WP No. 1685 of 2022

C/W

WP No. 16654 of 2021

WP No. 293 of 2022

(REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT)

&RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. D.MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

QUASH THE REGISTRATION UNDER THE SAID ACT OF R-3

ASSOCIATION AND ITS BYE LAWS ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF

R-2 ENCLOSED AS ANNX-D AND E AND ETC.,

IN WRIT PETITION NO. 16654 OF 2021

BETWEEN:

M/S LILIUM GARDENIA RESIDENTS WELFARE

ASSOCIATION (R)

AN ASSOCIATION UNDER REGISTERED UNDER

THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES

REGISTRATION ACT, 1960

HAVING ITS OFFICE AT DHAMMANGI

LILIUM GARDENIA APARTMENT

SY NO.98/1, 98/3, RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE,

BDS LAYOUT HEGDE NAGARA

BENGALURU 3 560 077

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT

MR.DEEPAK P.M.

&PETITIONER

(BY SRI. RAVI R., ADVOCATE)

- 4 -

WP No. 1685 of 2022

C/W

WP No. 16654 of 2021

WP No. 293 of 2022

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR

DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD,

NEAR RAJ BHAVAN,

VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU

KARNATAKA 3 560 052.

2.

THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

SOCIETIES

BANGALORE URBAN-1

SHANKARA SOUDHA, MARGOSA ROAD,

MALLESWARAM

BENGALURU 3 560 003.

3.

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR

OFFICE THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES

3RD FLOOR, TRIUMPH TOWERS

NO.48, CHURCH STREET

BENGALURU 3 560 001.

&RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP.)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE

A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER

WRIT/ORDER

OR

DIRECTION

QUASHIN

SL.NO.DRB-

1/SS/COM/2020-21 DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

SOCIETIES

BANGALORE

URBAN-1-DATED

29-6-2021

I.E.

ANNEXURE-E.

- 5 -

WP No. 1685 of 2022

C/W

WP No. 16654 of 2021

WP No. 293 of 2022

IN WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

MR.PRAKASH CHANDRA RAO ALUGGELU

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

S/O GANGADHAR RAO ALUGGELU

FLAT NO.101, BLOCK C

LILIUM GARDENIA, 2ND CROSS ROAD

BDS LAYOUT, DR.SRK NAGAR

HEGDE NAGAR

BENGALURU 3 560 077.

&PETITIONER

(BY SRI. VITTAL B. R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION

ROOM NO.618,

6TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING

BENGALURU 3 560 001.

2.

THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

BANGALORE URBAN ZONE-1

NO.146, SAHAKARA SOUDHA

8TH CROSS ROAD,

3RD MAIN, MARGOSA ROAD

MALLESHWARAM

BENGALURU 3 560 003.

- 6 -

WP No. 1685 of 2022

C/W

WP No. 16654 of 2021

WP No. 293 of 2022

3.

LILIUM GARDENIA RESIDENTS

WELFARE ASSOCIATION

DHAMMANGI LILIUM GARDENIA APARTMENTS

SY NO.98/1, 98/3,

RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE

BDS LAYOUT, HEGDENAGARA

BENGALURU 3 560 077

(REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT)

&RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2;

SRI.R.RAVI, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

QUASH THE REGISTRATION UNDER THE SAID ACT OF R-3

ASSOCIATION AND ITS BYELAWS ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF

R-2 VIDE ANNX-B AND C ENCLOSED IN PAGE NUMBER AND

ETC.

THESE WRIT PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

These petitions call in question the act of the

respondents 3 Welfare Associations of the respective

apartments seeking maintenance from the hands of the

residents of the apartments, notwithstanding the fact that

the

Welfare

Associations

are

registered

under

the

- 7 -

Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 (8the Act, 1960

for short).

2. Heard Sri Vittal B.R., learned counsel for the

petitioner in W.P.Nos.1685/2022 and 293/2022, Sri Ravi

R.,

learned

counsel

for

the

petitioner

in

W.P.No.16654/2021, Smt. Rashmi Patel, learned High

Court Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 and 2 in

W.P.Nos.1685/2022 and 293/2022 and respondent Nos.1

to 3 in W.P.No.16654/2021, Sri D. Manjunath, learned

counsel for respondent No.3 in W.P.No.1685/2022 and

Sri R. Ravi, learned counsel for respondent No.3 in

W.P.No.293/2022.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the parties

would accept the fact that the issue is covered by an order

passed by the Division Bench, on an identical issue in

W.A.No.974/2019, disposed on 06.11.2019, has held as

follows:

- 8 -

<4. The submission of the learned counsel appearing for

the appellant is that the objects of the appellant

Association will fall in the categories covered by Section

3 of the said Act of 1960. He pointed out that the

dominant purpose or object of forming the said

Association is to administer, maintain and run the

buildings and apartments constructed by the aforesaid

developer.

He

submitted

that

in

fact,

the

appellant has been collecting maintenance charges for

maintaining the residential complex from a majority of

the apartment owners, barring a few of the owners of

the apartments who are opposing the appellant. He

submitted that there is nothing wrong with the

registration of the appellant Association under the said

Act of 1960 and that if the impugned order is

maintained, the members who have not paid the

maintenance will go scot-free. Without prejudice to his

contentions, he submitted that the first to seventh

respondents must co-operate for formation of the

Association as contemplated by the said Act of 1972.

5.

We

have

given

careful

consideration

to

the

submissions.

6. Section 3 of the said Act of 1960 reads thus:

<3. Societies to which the Act applies.-

The following societies may be registered

under this Act:4

Societies established for:4

(a)

the promotion of charity;

(b)

the promotion of education, science,

literature, or the fine arts;

(c)

the promotion of sports;

- 9 -

(d)

the instruction and the diffusion of

knowledge relating to commerce or

industry or of any other useful

knowledge;

(e)

the diffusion of political education;

(f)

the foundation or maintenance of

libraries

or

reading

rooms

for

general use among the members or

open to the public, or of public

museums and galleries of painting

and other works of art;

[(ff) the promotion of conservation and

proper use of natural resources and scarce

infrastructural facilities like land, power,

water, forest and such other resources

and infrastructural facilities, as may be

notified by the State Government from

time to time.]

(g)

the collection of natural history,

mechanical

and

philosophical

inventions Or designs and

Which intend to apply their profits, if any,

or other income in promoting their objects

and prohibit the payment of any dividend

or distribution of any income or profits

among their members.=

Even according to the case of the appellant, the

dominant object for the formation of the appellant

Association is to administer, maintain and run the

building and apartments. Clauses 5.1 and 5.2 are,

even according to the learned counsel for the

appellant, the dominant objects of the Association, and

they read thus:

5.1 To administer, maintain and run the

building and apartments known as VDB

Celadon

No.23/3,

23/4,

26/1,

Shivanahalli

Hobli,

Jakkur

Road,

- 10 -

Yelahanka,

Bangalore

3

560064.

5.2 To Carry on the Day-to-day work

relating to all aspects of the building,

apartments,

common

areas,

common

facilities and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top