SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT NARAYANAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI T N CHANDRAIAH – Respondent


DATED

26.11.2021 PASSED IN APPLICATION FILED BY THE

PETITIONER HEREIN FOR ENHANCEMENT OF SHARE OR

3

EQUAL SHARE ON PAR WITH SON IN FDP NO.1/2010 ON

THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT

ANEKAL VIDE ANNX-A.

THIS

WRIT

PETITION

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE

THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioner's application in FDP No.01/2010 on

the file of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal

(for short, 'the civil Court') is rejected by the impugned

order dated 26.11.2021. The civil Court by this

impugned order has not only rejected the petitioner's

application for enlargement of shares granted in terms

of the preliminary decree confirmed in an appeal by this

Court but has also directed drawing up of final decree in

terms of the sketch filed by the Commissioner along

with his report dated 22.04.2019. The petitioner's

application, which is for enlargement of shares based on

the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vineeta

Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma reported in 2020 (9) SCC

1, is rejected solely on the ground that the petitioner

4

has not produced any documents to show that she was

born prior to 1956.

Sri Fayaz Sab B.G., the learned counsel for the

petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top