2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 50741
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1860 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
YOGISH,
S/O. RAMANANDA MERA,
AGED 30 YEARS,
R/O. KEMARU, NAGI HITTALU HOUSE,
PALADKA VILLAGE, MANGALURU TALUK,
D.K. DISTRICT 3 574 104.
& APPELLANT
[BY SRI. P. KARUNAKAR, ADVOCATE]
AND:
THE STATE BY KARKALA POLICE,
KAUP CIRCLE, UDUPI DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SPP.,
HIGH COURT BUILDING, HIGH COURT,
BANGALORE 3 560 001.
& RESPONDENT
[BY SRI. KRISHNAKUMAR K.K., HCGP]
* * *
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374 (2)
OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF COURT OF
PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI, DATED
07.07.2018, PASSED IN S.C. NO.24/2015, CONVICTING THE
APPELLANT FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 376,
292, 420 AND 506 OF IPC AND SECTION 67A OF I.T. ACT.
THIS
CRIMINAL
APPEAL
COMING
ON
FOR
FURTHER
DICTATION, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE/PHYSICAL HEARING,
THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
This appeal is directed against the Judgment and
Order dated 07.07.2018 passed by the Court of Principal
Sessions Judge, Udupi in Sessions Case No.24/2015,
whereby
the
appellant/accused
was
convicted
and
sentenced for offence punishable under Sections 376, 292,
420 and 506 of IPC and Section 67(A) of the Information
Technology Act, 2000 [hereinafter referred to as 8I.T. Act
for short].
2.
Heard the learned counsel for appellant and the
learned HCGP for respondent/State and perused the
evidence and material on record.
3.
It is the case of prosecution that, the accused
who was already married, on a false assurance of marriage,
committed sexual intercourse with the victim/P.W.1 against
her will and while committing the said act, videographed
the act in his mobile phone and transmitted it into a
compact disk [CD] and thereafter refused to marry her and
3
also threatened her with dire consequences saying that he
will finish her life, if she revealed the matter to others.
To establish the guilt of the accused, the prosecution
got examined P.Ws.1 to 12 and got marked Exs.P1 to 17
and M.Os.1 and 2. The defence got marked Ex.D1, a
portion of the statement of P.W.2.
The learned Sessions Judge vide impugned Judgment
and Order, convicted and sentenced the accused for the
charged offences. Hence, this appeal.
4.
P.W.1 is the victim who lodged the complaint as
per Ex.P1. Her statement recorded under Section 164 of
Cr.P.C. is marked as Ex.P3.
5.
P.W.2 is the brother of the victim. He is also an
attester to the spot mahazar-Ex.P2 and a witness to Ex.P7
under which the mobile phone-M.O.1 of the accused was
seized, witness to Ex.P8 i.e, the seizure of CD-M.O.2 and
witness to Ex.P4 under which the motorcycle of the
accused was seized.
4
6.
P.W.3 is the doctor, who examined the accused
and issued the certificate which is marked as Ex.P9. He has
opined that there is nothing to suggest that the accused is
incapable of performing sexual intercourse.
7.
P.W.4 is the Assistant Engineer, who has
prepared the sketch as per Ex.P10, the spot where the
accused is alleged to have committed sexual intercourse
with the victim.
8.
P.W.5 is the Head Mistress, who has issued
Ex.P11 with regard to Date of Birth of the accused.
9.
P.W.6 is the panch-witness to Ex.P4 under
which the Police seized the motorcycle of the accused.
Exs.P5 and 6 are the photographs of the motorcycle.
10. P.W.7 is another panch-witness to Exs.P2, 4, 7
and 8.
11.
P.W.8 is the WPC., who recorded the further
statement of the victim/P.W.1 as per Ex.P14. Further, she
took the victim to the hospital for medical examination.
5
12.
P.W.9 is the Head Constable, who seized the
motorcycle of the accused under Ex.P4.
13.
P.W.10 is the Police Inspector, who took over
further investigation from C.W.22 [P.W.12]. He received
the Medical Report of P.W.1, which is marked as Ex.P13.
He sent the mobile phone [M.O.1] of the accused and CD
[M.O.2] as well as the pubic hair and nail scrapping to the
Forensic Science Laboratory for examination. He has
handed over the further investigation to C.W.22 [P.W.12].
14.
P.W.11
is
the
Police
Sub-Inspector,
who
received the written complaint from P.W.1 on 27.03.2011
and registered a case and issued FIR-Ex.P15. He has
conducted spot mahazar-Ex.P2 in the presence of P.Ws.2
and 7 and arrested the accused. Further, he seized the
mobile phone [M.O.1] of the accused under a mahazar-
Ex.P7 and seized CD [M.O.2] from the house of the aunt of
the accused under a mahazar Ex.P8. On completion of the
investigation, he has filed the charge-sheet for offence
punishable under Sections 376, 292 and 506 of IPC.
6
15.
P.W.12
is
the
CPI.,
who
took
further
investigation
from
P.W.10.
He
conducted
seizure
panchanama of the motorcycle of the accused, received
copy of the victim9s statement recorded under Section 164
of Cr.P.C. as per Ex.P3, collected RFSL and CFSL Report as
per Exs.P16 and 17 etc. He has filed additional charge-
sheet against the accused under Sections 376, 292,