SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 51331

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
KHAJA BANDENAWAZ DARGA COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ORS – Respondent


The learned counsel Sri Ravi B.Patil for petitioner

submits that the fourth respondent is a formal party and

no relief is sought against respondent No.4.

2.

The submission of the learned counsel for the

petitioner is placed on record.

3.

The writ petition is filed seeking writ of

mandamus

directing

the

respondents-authority–

respondents Nos.1 to 3 not to demolish the Masjid

constructed in the schedule property. The description of

3

the property shown in the schedule to the writ petition

reads as under :-

“All that piece and parcel of the immovable

property together with a constructed portion of

masjid in the name and style of Jama-E-Masjid

constructed over land in Sy.No.63 of Yerandi Village

(Bandenawaz Wadi) measuring in an extent of 60x40

situated at Yerandi Village, Tq :Basavakalyan,

Dist : Bidar which property is bounded as under :

East by : Graveyard

West by : Portion of Darga,

North by : Portion of IDGA Property,

South by : Public road.

4.

It is the contention of the petitioner that the

Masjid is built in the land bearing Sy.No.63 of Yernadi

Village and it measures 60x40 feet. The boundary of the

property is also provided. The Annexure-A is the

registration certificate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top