2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 31239
- 1 -
CRL.P No. 6966 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6966 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
BHADRA @ VEERABADRAIAH
S/O C S NAGARAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
R/AT ITTAMADU, BENGALURU-560085
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.70,
HUNASAVADI VILLAGE,
PURAVARA HOBLI,
MADHUGIRI TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572175
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVIKUMAR G H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
SUBRAMANYAPURA P S,
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001
&RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by
PADMAVATHI B K
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 6966 of 2022
(BY SRI. K.S. ABHIJITH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE
FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS IN S.C.NO.1671/2021 ON THE FILE OF LXIII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
(CCH-64), PENDING AGAINST THIS PETITIONER FOR AN
OFFENCE P/U/S 399 AND 402 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Heard the learned counsel, Sri. G.H. Ravikumar,
appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K.S. Abhijith, learned
HCGP appearing for the respondent - State.
2.
The petitioner is before this Court calling in
question
the
proceedings
in
S.C.No.1671/2021
for
offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the
IPC. The petitioner is accused No.6. On 19.01.2017, the
respondent - police register a crime in Crime No.27/2017
against 8 persons for offences punishable under Sections
399 and 402 of the IPC. The police after investigation file a
charge sheet and the case was then registered as
C.C.No.23797/2017
and
on
its
committal,
becomes
S.C.No.1343/2019.
- 3 -
3.
By an order dated 31.07.2018, after a full
blown trial, the concerned court acquits accused Nos.1 to
4 of the offences so laid against them, which were the
ones punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC.
Insofar as the present petitioner is concerned, he was not
available for trial at the relevant point in time, when
accused Nos.1 to 4 were tried and a split charge sheet
against the petitioner was laid in S.C.No.1671/2021 and is
now sought to be tried in S.C.No.1671/2021 for the very
offences that were alleged against all the 8 accused i.e.,
the ones punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the
IPC. It is the continuance of the trial that drives the
petitioner to this Court in the subject petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the allegations against all the accused are the
same and after a full blown trial, accused Nos.1 to 4 were
acquitted and the petitioner is now sought to be continued
on account of his absence during the trial and on the
strength of a split charge that is made as aforesaid and
- 4 -
submits that the proceedings ought to be quashed, as the
evidence that would be brought before the Court in
S.C.No.1343/2017 would be the same, this was considered
and rejected by the concerned Court while acquitting
accused Nos.1 to 4.
5.
Learned HCGP
would
however refute the
submission to contend that the petitioner would escape
trial, should necessarily face trial and considered for
acquittal by the concerned Court and this Court should not
interfere at this juncture, as a person, who has escaped
trial, should not be shown any indulgence under section
482 of Cr.P.C .
6.
I have given my anxious consideration to the
respective submissions made by the learned counsel and
have perused the material on record.
7.
The afore-narrated facts are not in dispute. The
solitary incident of preparation for commission of dacoity
as obtaining under Section 399 or 402 Cr.P.C. becomes a
crime in Crime No.27/2017 against 8 accused. All the 8
- 5 -
accused were alleged of the same offence. Accused Nos.5
to 8 were not available for trial at the point when the trial
was taken up and split charge sheet was issued against
them. After a full blown trial, accused Nos.1 to 4 were
acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge on 31.07.2018.
The reasons rendered by the learned Sessions Judge for
acquitting accused Nos.1 to 4 are as follows:
"14. PW.1 is the complainant of this case. He
clearly stated before Court regarding receipt of
information, securing of his staff and panchas
and went to the spot, conducted raid, arrested
accused No.1 to 4 and recovered MOs.1 to 4
from the spot. Then he returned to the police
station and handed over the accused persons,
seized material objections, mahazar and report
to the S.H.O. of their police station.
15. PW.2 has also given evidence in the line of
PW.2 stating he accompanied PW.1 in the raid.
PW.3 is the P.S.I., who received complaint from
CW.1. He stated before the Court that on
19.01.2017,
at
about
3.30
p.m.,
A.S.I.,
Krishnamurthy/PW.1 produced accused No.1 to
4, seized material objects and mahazar and gave
- 6 -
report. Then he registered case in Cr.No.27/2017
against the accused persons of the offence
punishable U/Secs.399 and 402 of IPC and sent
F.I.R. to the Court. Thereafter, he subjected the
seized materials object to P.