The petitioner, who asserts that she owned certain

extents of land in Sy.No.36 of Talakuppe Village, Bidadi

Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk (for short, 8the subject

property9) and her property is assessed for revenue with

3

the Manchenayakanahalli Panchyath, has sought for

the following relief:

<Grant a Writ of Certiorari to quash the acquisition

proceedings

under

Gazette

Notification

as

Annexure-A

dated

18.01.2006

bearing

No.CI/372/SPQ/2005 and consequently declare

that the acquisition proceedings does not bind the

petitioners right, title and interest over the schedule

land.=

2.

It is undisputed that the petitioner had

impugned the acquisition proceedings commenced

under the provisions of the Karnataka Industrial Areas

Development Act, 1966 (for short, 8the KIADB Act9) in

W.P.No.35813/2013 (LA-KIADB) and this writ petition is

rejected by the order dated 23.04.2018 and is later

confirmed by the Division Bench of this Court with the

dismissal of the writ appeal in W.A.No.1491/2018 (LA-

KIADB) on 13.03.2019.

4

3.

The petitioner9s present grievance with the

acquisition proceedings is premised in the assertion

that the land acquired under the provisions of KIADB

Act cannot be utilized for th