SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.O.CHANDRASHEKAR – Appellant
Versus
M/S KADIDAL S RAMAPPA GOWDA & CO – Respondent


DTD

8.12.2016

PASSED

BY

LEARNED

II

ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA IN

2

O.S.NO.33/2014

PRODUCED

AT

ANNEXURE-F

AND

THEREBY

DIRECT

THE

RESPONDENT

TO

CAUSE

PRODUCTION OF THE DOCUMENTS SOUGHT FOR IN THE

NTOICE DTD 5.10.2016 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER

ORDER XI RULE 16 OF CPC PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D

TO THIS PETITION.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The captioned writ petition is filed by the

petitioner-defendant, who is questioning the order

dated 08.12.2016 passed by the learned II Additional

Senior Civil Judge, Shivamogga in O.S.No.33/2014 as

per Annexure-F refusing the prayer of the petitioner -

defendant to cause production of the documents as

sought by the petitioner - defendant.

2. Facts leading to the case are as under;

The respondent - plaintiff has instituted a suit in

O.S.No.33/2014

for

recovery

of

sum

of

Rs.10,22,000/-. The respondent - plaintiff specifically

3

claimed that the present petitioner - defendant

approached one of the partner of the firm by name

K.R.Gopal seeking financial assistance by way of

advance for supplying of Areca nut grown by the

petitioner. The respondent - plaintiff has further

cont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top