SRI MANU H – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Heard Sri. Giri Kumar S.V., learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. S.Vishwamurthy, learned HCGP for the
respondent-State and perused the records.
2.
Present petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
with the following prayer:
<Wherefore, the petitioner most humbly
prays that this Hon9ble Court may be pleased
to grant anticipatory bail and direct the
respondent No.1-police to enlarge him on bail,
in the event of his arrest in Cr.No.43/2021
registered by respondent No.1-police station
and registered as Spl. Case No.115/2021
against
the
Petitioner
for
the
offences
registered under Sections 366, 376(2)(n),
354(D), 363 read with Section 34 of IPC and
Sections 6 and 12 of POCSO Act and Section 9
of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, in the
interest of justice and equity=.
3
3.
The brief facts of the case are as under:
The complaint came to be filed by Smt. Lakhmi wife of
Venkateshachari contending that her daughter aged about 15
years 5 months has been eloped by the accused herein on
24.02.2021 and on 03.03.2021 at about 6.00 am, he married
her and had sexual intercourse with her. The victim girl has
been traced by the police and she was produced before the
Jurisdictional M
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.