SMT. KUSUMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the
proceedings in C.C.No.630 of 2016 pending before the Civil
Judge and JMFC, Arkalgud registered for offences punishable
under Sections 408, 409 read with Section 34 of the IPC.
Sans details, facts in brief, are as follows:-
The 2nd respondent/Chief Executive Officer of Hassan Zilla
Panchayat is the complainant. The complaint is against the
petitioner who at the relevant point of time was working as
3
President of Kathimallenahalli Village Panchayat. The allegation
is that during the tenure of the petitioner along with others had
misappropriated funds that were to be distributed as salary to
the employees/persons who had been engaged under the
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee
Scheme
(8the
Scheme9
for
short).
This
allegation
of
misappropriation leads to registration of FIR against several
people. The petitioner was neither named in the complaint nor in
the FIR. It was a general allegation made by the Chief Executive
Officer of the Zilla Panchayat.
3.
Based on registration of the FIR, the police filed a
final report/charge sheet. It is here the name of the petitioner
figures as accused No.5. The summary o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.