- 1 -
CRL.P No. 102720 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102720 OF 2022 (439-)
BETWEEN:
SANTOSH LAMANI ALIAS TAGADINAMANE SANTOSHA
ALIAS ESHA S/O. LAMANI YALLAPPA
AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC. LABOUR,
R/O. HANGOOR VILLAGE, TALUK. HADAGALI,
DIST. VIJAYANAGARA
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. IRANAGOUDA K. KABBUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH HIREHADAGALI POLICE
R/BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BENCH DHARWAD-580011
&RESPONDENT
(SRI. PRASHANTH V. MOGALI, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO THAT THE PETITION MAY BE ALLOWED AND THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED MAY BE RELEASED ON REGULAR BAIL, IN
HIREHADAGALI PS CRIME NO.181/2021, FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE U/S 366, 376(N), 506 OF IPC. THE BAIL APPLICATION
FILED BY THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C., IN
CRL.MISC.P.NO.5221/2022, BEFORE THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 102720 of 2022
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BALLARI, SITTING AT HOSAPETE, HAS BEEN
DISMISSED.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused under Section
439 of Cr.P.C., seeking bail in Crime No.181/2021 of
Hirehadagali police station registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 366, 376(N) and 506 of IPC.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, the father of
the victim-lady has filed complaint stating that, he is having
two children including the victim-lady. It is further stated
that, the victim-lady is married to one Devaraj and she is
having a male child. The complainant had filed missing
complaint of his daughter victim-lady on 24.11.2021 before
the Hirehadagali police station and on 08.12.2021, the police
secured his daughter victim-lady and the petitioner, and at
that time, the wife of the complainant enquired her daughter
wherein she has told that, she came in acquaintance with the
petitioner and once when she was quarreling with her
husband,
accused
has
threatened
her
husband
and
- 3 -
subsequently asked the victim-lady to come out with him
and he will marry her, and on 20.11.2021 at about 2.20
a.m., when her child was crying she came out, at that time
he
took
her
to
Hadagali
village
and
thereafter
to
Chikkamagalur in Bus and kept her in a Narigudda estate
where he has committed forcible intercourse on her. The
petitioner came to be arrested on 08.12.2021 and is in
judicial custody. The police after investigation filed charge-
sheet against the petitioner for the offences punishable
under Section 366, 376(N), 506 of IPC.
3.
The
petitioner
filed
Criminal
Miscellaneous
No.5221/2022 seeking bail and the same came to be
rejected by III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ballari,
sitting at Hospete by order dated 30.03.2022. Therefore, the
petitioner is before this Court seeking bail.
4.
Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for
the petitioner and the learned HCGP for the respondent-
State.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend
that, the victim-lady is major by age and on looking to the
- 4 -
averments of her statement, she voluntarily went along with
this petitioner and stayed with him for three weeks which
itself shows that physical relationship between them is a
consensual. It is his further submission that, the Doctor who
examined the victim-lady has noted history as told by her
wherein she has stated that, she and the petitioner were
acquainted with each other since May, 2019 while working at
Alldur Chota Chikkamangaluru district, Kundur coffee estate
and they started liking each other and use to have sexual
intercourse often once in a week and thereafter, she came
back to her village in September, 2020 and they were in
contact through phone, and on 20.11.2021 the petitioner
came to her village at 2.00 p.m. and forced her to come with
him and both of them came to Hadagali village along with
child and thereafter proceeded to Chikkamagalur and stayed
at coffee estate till 07.12.2021 and they use to have sexual
intercourse once in three days and last was on 05.12.2021.
It is his further submission that, from the said history given
by the victim-lady itself shows that she had affair with this
petitioner and her physical relationship was consensual. It is
- 5 -
his further submission that, the charge-sheet is filed and the
petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation.
6.
Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that, the
statement of the victim-lady has been recorded under
Section 164 of Cr.P.C., wherein she has stated that, the
petitioner had forcible sexual intercourse on her and he kept
her for three weeks in the coffee estate. It is his further
submission that, as per the school records the date of birth
of the victim-lady is 11.06.2000 and she is aged 21 years as
on the date of the alleged offence. It is his further
submission that, the charge-sheet material shows prima
facie case against the petitioner. With this he prayed to
reject the petition.
7.
Having
heard
the
learned
counsel
for
the
petitioner and the learned HCGP for the respondent-State,
this Court has gone thr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.