1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9801/2022
BETWEEN:
SACHIN KUMAR H.N
S/O NINGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
R/AT, KARYALAYA BADAVANE
HOLLENARASIPURA TOWN
HASSAN TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 211
&.PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRATHEEP K.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY HOLENARASIPURA TOWN
POLICE STATION, HASSAN DISTRICT
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-01
2.
VANAJAKSHI
W/O LATE BASAVALINGAPPA
MAJOR
R/AT, HIREBELAGULI VILLAGE
HALEKOTE HOBLI
HOLENARASIPURA TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT-34
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO
ENLARGE
THE
PETITIONER
ON
BAIL
IN
SPL.CASE
NO.225/2022(CR.NO.43/2022) OF HOLENARASIPURA TOWN
P.S., HASSAN DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 363, 376,
114, 34 OF IPC AND SEC.4, 17 OF POCSO ACT ON THE FILE
OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-1 AT
HASSAN.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the petitioner/Accused No.2
under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in
Crime
No.43/2022
(Spl.
Case
No.225/2022)
of
Holenarasipura Town Police Station, initially registered
for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC
which has culminated in submission of charge sheet for
the offence punishable under Sections 363, 376 and 114
read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 4 and 17 of
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
(for short 8POCSO Act9), pending on the file of Additional
District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Hassan.
3
The brief factual matrix leading to the case
are that the victim is the second daughter of the
complainant and studying II PUC. She was in love with
accused No.1 and the present petitioner is the friend of
accused No.1. However, both of them belong to different
caste and as such the mother of the victim i.e., the
complainant was against their marriage. It is further
alleged that on 22.03.2022 when the victim was in the
house the accused No.1 came there along with the
present petitioner and they eloped on a two wheeler.
When the complainant returned around about 4.30 p.m.
she found that her daughter was not in the house and
lodged a missing complaint. Subsequently, it is noticed
that present petitioner along with the victim and
accused No.1 stayed in the house of sister of accused
No.1 wherein accused No.1 and the victim had sexual
relationship. The victim after having knowledge of
missing complaint lodged by her mother returned. Then
the police have also secured accused No.1 and present
4
petitioner and apprehended them. The petitioner was
produced before the Spl. Court and was remanded to
judicial custody. He has moved the regular bail petition
before the learned Spl. Judge and his bail petition came
to be rejected. Hence, he is before this Court.
3.
Heard the arguments advanced by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and learned High
Court
Government
Pleader
for
respondent-State.
Perused the records.
4.
The allegations of the prosecution does
disclose that the present petitioner was charge sheeted
for the offence punishable under Section 114 of IPC and
Section 17 of the POCSO Act. The allegations against
him are that he had assisted and abetted the accused
No.1 in kidnapping the minor victim from the custody of
the minor guardian and he was equally responsible for
sexual assault committed by accused No.1 on the victim.
However, the records disclose that the present petitioner
5
was only a rider of the motor cycle on which deceased
and victim have travelled. No other specific overt-act is
attributed to him. He is in custody since 26.03.2022. No
doubt under Section 17 of the POCSO Act he is also
equally responsible for the act alleged against the
accused No.1 for the offence under POCSO Act. But
however, he is only travelled with them and he stayed in
the same house, but in a different room. No sexual
assault is alleged against the present petitioner. He is
friend of accused No.1 and it appears that he has aided
the love affair between them, but it is only because of
the adolescence age. Investigation is concluded and
charge sheet is already laid down. The present petitioner
is in custody since 26.03.2022 and his custodial
interrogation is no more required by the investigating
agency.
5.
Under these circumstances, I do not find any
impediment for admitting the petitioner on bail and the
6
other apprehensions raised by the learned HCGP can be
meted out by imposing certain conditions. Hence, the
petition needs to be allowed and accordingly, I proceed
to pass the following:
ORDER
The
petition
is
allowed.
The
petitioner/Accused
No.2
is
directed
to
be
enlarged on bail in Crime No.43/2022 (Spl. Case
No.225/2022) of Holenarasipura Town Police
Station, registered for the offence punishable
under Sections 363, 376 and 114 read with
Section 34 of IPC and Sections 4 and 17 of
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,
2012 (for short 8POCSO Act9), pendi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.