2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 35086
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SRI.DEEPAK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
CRL.P/3721/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3721/2021
BETWEEN
1.
SRI.DEEPAK KUMAR,
S/O SRI. MAHENDRA KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
MANAGER,
KEHEMS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.,
R/AT FLAT NO.D-3,
SAMHITHA SPICE WOOD, WEST BLOCK,
G M PALYA, 6TH MAIN,
THIPPASANDRA POST,
BENGALURU - 560 075.
2.
SRI. MUKESH RATHORE,
S/O SRI. MADANLAL RATHORE,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
OCCUPATION:
FACTORY MANAGER,
KEHEMS TECHONOLOGIES PVT. LTD.,
NO.47, CHANDRABHAGANAGAR,
JUNI INDORE, INDORE,
MADHYA PRADESH - 452 007.
... PETITIONERS
[BY SRI.MURTHY D NAIK, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI.MAHENDRA G., ADVOCATE]
2
AND
1.
THE STATE,
BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KORAMANGALA POLICE STATION,
MADIWALA SUB-DIVISION,
BENGALURU CITY.
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT.
2.
SRI. SHARATH S.,
S/O SHASHI P. S.,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
ADDRESS AS MENTIONED IN THE
CHARGE-SHEET:
NO.24/1, GANGAMMA TEMPLE STREET,
B. NARAYANAPURA,
M V G LAYOUT,
BENGALURU - 562 135.
NOW RESIDINT AT
SANGUPURATHIL,
KARUNAPURAM
IDUKKI – 685 602,
KERALA.
... RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI.SHANKAR H.S., HCGP FOR R1;
R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED]
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO (1) QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
PENDING IN C.C.NO.6755/2020 ON THE FILE OF XLI ADDITIONAL
CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU CITY, AGAINST
THE PETITIONERS - ACCUSED NUMBERS 4 AND 5, FOR THE
OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS - 304A AND 338 OF THE INDIAN
PENAL CODE, AS PER ANNEXURE – A AND ETC.
3
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioners are before this Court calling in question
proceedings in C.C.No.6755/2020 pending on the file of XLI
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.
2.
Heard the learned Senior counsel, Sri. Murthy D.
Naik and Sri. Shankar H.S., learned HCGP appearing for
respondent No.1.
3.
The
petitioners,
who
are
the
employees
of
M/s. KEHEMS Technologies Pvt. Ltd., enter into a annual
maintenance contract for heat pumps with the Grand Mercure
Hotel, Bengaluru on 31.03.2019. It transpires that on
15.02.2020, Grand Mercure Hotel raises a complaint with regard
to certain defects in heat pumps at their hotel. Accordingly, a
Branch Co-ordinator was deputed to attend to the complaint. On
15.02.2020, an accidental blast takes place while servicing the
heat pump, in which, the respondent No.2 - Service Engineer
4
and another by name Jeswin M.V., both employees of
M/s.
KEHEMS
Technologies
Pvt.
Ltd.
were
injured.
Subsequently, on 21.02.2020, Sri. Jeswin M.V., succumbed to
the injuries. Based upon the said accident, proceedings were
instituted against the petitioners for offences punishable under
Sections 304A and 338 of the IPC. The petitioners are accused
Nos.4 and 5 in the said proceeding. While filing the charge sheet,
the employees of Grand Mercure Hotel have been left and the
petitioners,
who
are
the
employees
of
M/s.
KEHEMS
Technologies Pvt. Ltd., who had annual service contract
agreement with Grand Mercure Hotel are hauled into these
proceedings. It is at that juncture, the petitioners have knocked
the doors of this Court.
4.
Learned Senior counsel, Sri. Murthy D. Naik, would
submit that it was an accident that took place in Grand Mercure
Hotel while servicing the heat pumps by a Service Engineer, a
report was also sought from the hands of one SSS Consultants
with regard to accident. The report opined that it was an
5
accident that has happened due to human error and therefore,
the petitioners cannot be hauled into these proceedings
particularly for offence punishable under 304A of the IPC.
5.
The learned Senior counsel would also place reliance
upon the following judgments rendered by the Ap