SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 53848

MOHAMMED KAMALUDDIN @ SAYYED SAIDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY PUTTUR RURAL POLICE – Respondent


The accused persons have filed these criminal appeals

against the impugned judgment of conviction dated 22.02.2017

and order of sentence dated 25.02.2017 made in Sessions Case

No.33/2013 on the file of the V Additional District and Sessions

Judge,

Dakshina

Kannada,

Mangaluru,

Sitting

at

Puttur,

Dakshina Kannada, convicting the accused Nos.1 and 2 for the

offences punishable under the provisions of sections 449, 302,

392 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter

referred to as <IPC= for short).

2.

It is the case of the prosecution that, the accused

No.1 is the resident of Karkalli, Bane House of Nagarror Village

of Somawarpete Taluk of Kodagu District and married to the

daughter of Puthumonu, resident of Kodankeri of Kodimbala

Village, Puttur Taluk. Accused No.2 is the resident of Muriyala

House of Uruvalu Village of Belthangady Taluk and married the

daughter of Mammunhi, resident of Kodengeri of Kodimbala

5

Village, Puttur Taluk, situated nearby the house of the wife of

the accused No.1. They came to know each other while coming

to their in-laws house and became close to each other. Accused

No.2 earlier supplied laterite stone and sand to one Baby @

Thomas while

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top