SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK S.KINAGI
SRI. GNANENDRA C S – Appellant
Versus
SMT SAROJA M – Respondent


XXXIX

RULES

1

AND

2

OF

CPC.

THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE

COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The appellant being aggrieved by the order dated

22.10.2021 passed on I.A.Nos.1 and 2 in O.S.No.7464/2013

by XXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru

City (CCH-40), has filed this appeal.

3

2. Brief facts leading rise to filing of this petition are

as under:

The appellant has filed a suit in O.S.No.7464/2013

seeking for the relief of specific performance of contract and

also for the relief of perpetual injunction. In the said suit,

the appellant has filed the applications i.e., I.A.No.1/2021

seeking for the relief of an order of temporary injunction

restraining the

respondent

No.4

from

puttingup any

construction/carrying out any development activities over

the suit schedule property and to maintain status-quo during

the pendency of the suit and I.A.No.2/2021 for the relief of

temporary injunction restraining the respondents No.1 to 4

from alienating the suit schedule property during the

pendency of the suit. The Trial Court after hearing the

parties, passed the impugned order dated 22.10.2021,

dismissing the application filed by the appellant. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top