SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DR. PRABHUDEV S/O. CHINNAPPA ANDANI – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent


The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging

the order dated 29.11.2008 passed by the 1st respondent

vide Annexure-F.

Brief facts leading rise to filing of this writ

petition are as under:

The

petitioner

has

obtained

loan

from

respondent No.4-Bank. The petitioner has committed

default in repaying the loan amount. Respondent No.4-

Bank has initiated proceedings under Section 14 of

SARFASI Act for recovery of amount against the petitioner

- 3 -

before the 1st respondent. The 1st Respondent has passed

the impugned order directing the Tahasildar to take

possession of property of the petitioner and handover the

same to respondent No.4-Bank. On the basis of the order

dated 23.09.2021 passed by respondent No.1, the

revenue officials have issued notice to the petitioner fixing

the date for taking the possession. Hence, this writ

petition.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, High

Court Government Pleader for respondent-State and

learned counsel for respondent No.4.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,

the petitioner in order to show his bonafideness has

deposited Rs.25,00,000/- as per the interim order dated

24.09.2021. He further submits that, the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top