DR. PRABHUDEV S/O. CHINNAPPA ANDANI – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent
The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging
the order dated 29.11.2008 passed by the 1st respondent
vide Annexure-F.
Brief facts leading rise to filing of this writ
petition are as under:
The
petitioner
has
obtained
loan
from
respondent No.4-Bank. The petitioner has committed
default in repaying the loan amount. Respondent No.4-
Bank has initiated proceedings under Section 14 of
SARFASI Act for recovery of amount against the petitioner
- 3 -
before the 1st respondent. The 1st Respondent has passed
the impugned order directing the Tahasildar to take
possession of property of the petitioner and handover the
same to respondent No.4-Bank. On the basis of the order
dated 23.09.2021 passed by respondent No.1, the
revenue officials have issued notice to the petitioner fixing
the date for taking the possession. Hence, this writ
petition.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, High
Court Government Pleader for respondent-State and
learned counsel for respondent No.4.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,
the petitioner in order to show his bonafideness has
deposited Rs.25,00,000/- as per the interim order dated
24.09.2021. He further submits that, the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.