2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37738
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.101982/2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. DONGRISAB S/O BABASAB
@ BAVASAB ARAMANI,
AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: COLLIE,
R/O.SIDDAPUR VILLAGE,
TQ.BILAGI, DIST.BAGALKOTE.
...PETITIONER
(BY SHRI SHIVAKUMAR S.BADAWADAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH BILAGI POLICE STATION,
NOW REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARANATAKA,
DHARWAD, BENCH AT DHARWD.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI PRASHANTH V. MOGALI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.439 OF THE
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE READ WITH SECTION 37 OF
THE NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT
SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN SPECIAL
CASE
NO.20/2022
(CRIME
NO.6/2022
OF
BILAGI
POLICE
STATION)
REGISTERED
FOR
THE
OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE
U/SEC.20(a), 20(B) (i), 20(B) (ii) (C) OF THE NARCOTIC
2
DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985, PENDING
ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BAGALKOTE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by accused under Section 439 of
the
Code
of
Criminal
Procedure,
1973
(hereinafter
referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for brevity) read with Section
37 of The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act
seeking bail in Bilagi Police Station Crime No.6/2022
registered for the offences punishable under Sections
20(a),
20(b)(i),
20(b)(ii)(C)
of
the
Narcotic
Drugs
and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to
as 8NDPS Act9, for brevity), pending in Special Case
No.20/2022, on the file of learned Prl. District and
Sessions Judge, Bagalakote.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, one Sri S.S.
Kamatagi, Police Inspector, Bilagi Police Station, has
lodged complaint contending that, on 09.01.2022 at about
3
2:30 pm, when he was in the police station, he received
credible information that a person has cultivated and
stored ganja in his land and selling the same for his
benefit. In pursuance of the said information, the
complainant secured panch witnesses, Gazetted Officer
and after obtaining permission from his Higher Officer
went
to
the
said
land
and
apprehended
the
petitioner/accused. During enquiry, the petitioner has
admitted that he has cultivated the ganja for selling the
same. Upon search, it was found that the accused has
stored 162kgs of ganja in 7 bundles and 25kg of ganja in
a manure bag and 10kg 600g of dried leaves. Thereafter,
the complainant has taken the samples and seized the
remaining ganja under panchanama in the presence of the
panchas and arrested the petitioner/accused and lodged
the complaint. On the basis of the said complaint, a case
came to be registered in Crime No.6/2022 in Bilagi Police
Station.
The
accused,
who
is
arrested,
has
been
remanded
to
judicial
custody.
The
Police
after
investigation filed charge sheet. The petitioner/accused
4
filed bail application in Crl.Misc. No.229/2022 and the
same came to be rejected by the learned Principal District
and
Sessions
Judge,
Bagalkote,
by
order
dated
30.04.2022. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court
seeking bail.
2.
Heard the arguments of the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court
Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
3.
It would be the contention of the learned
counsel
for
the
petitioner
that,
whatever
seized
is
cannabis plants which attracts an offence under Section
20(b)(i) of NDPS Act. It is his further submission that,
the entire seized material does not come under the
definition of <ganja= as provided under Section 2(iii)(b)
of NDPS Act. It is his submission that, the Investigating
agency has not separated the flowering or fruiting tops of
cannabis plants to say it is the ganja. The entire seeds,
leaves and stem have been weighed. It is his further
submission that what has been seized is a cannabis plant
5
and not ganja alone. He placed reliance on the decision
of the this Court in the case of Srinivasalu v. State of
Karnataka reported in 2019 SCC Online Kar 2711. It is
his further submission that the offence which is attracted
is Section 20(b)(i) of NDPs Act and the punishment for the
same is, imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10
years and shall also be liable to fine which may extend to
Rs.1,00,000/-. As charge-sheet is filed and investigation
is over, the petitioner is not required for any custodial
interrogation. With this he prayed to allow the petition.
4.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader would contend that what has been seized from the
possession of the accused is a commercial quantity of
ganja and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for
grant of bail as punishment prescribed for the same is
imprisonment for life for a term not les than 10 years but
which may extent to 20 years and shall also be liable to
with fine which shall not be less than Rs.1,00,000/- but
which may extend to Rs.2,00,000/-. It is his further
6
submission that if the petitioner is granted bail, he will
involve in commission of similar of