2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 55328
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NO.6988/2019 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. K. SUDHAMANI
W/O P.M. SADASHIVAIAH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT SHANKARAPURA VILLAGE
GOKUNTE POST, MULBAGAL TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI S. VISWESWARAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KOLAR DISTRICT,KOLAR-563 101.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR-563 101.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR, KOLAR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101.
5.
THE COMMISSIONER
CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
KOLAR CITY-563 101.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;
R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED
NOTICE
DATED
15.10.2017
ISSUED
BY
R-5
PRODUCED
AT
ANNEXURE-A
BY
ALLOWING
THIS
WRIT
PETITION.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 8B9 GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
Notice dated 15.10.2017 was issued by the 5th respondent
calling upon the petitioner to remove the construction by
encroaching the Raja Kaluve by invoking Section 187 of the
Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 (for short `Act'). In
pursuance of the impugned notice issued by the 5th respondent,
the petitioner has submitted a reply with the respondent No.5
stating that the construction put up by the petitioner is not on
the Raja Kaluve, and the construction put up by the petitioner
was in accordance with the sanctioned building plan. However,
the 5th respondent without examining the reply submitted by the
petitioner is proceeding to remove the alleged encroachment
made by the petitioner.
2.
In an identical matter, the learned counsel for the 5th
respondent herein has stated that they would pass appropriate
orders in accordance with law, after consideration of the reply
submitted by the petitioner therein and if necessary will conduct
3
an inspection of the property of the petitioner therein and
determine the existence on the Raja Kaluve. In view of the order
passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in WP
No.54174/2018 (DD 27.8.2021), this writ petition is also required
to be disposed of in the light of the order passed in the said writ
petition. Accordingly, I pass the following:
ORDER
i)
Writ petition is disposed of.
ii)
The reply submitted by the petitioner shall be
considered and the proceeding shall be completed within a period
of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order.
Till consideration of the reply submitted by the petitioner,
the 5th respondent is hereby restrained from taking any coercive
action against the petitioner in the light of the notice dated
15.10.2017 vide Annexure-A.
All contentions are kept open.
Sd/-
JUDGE
bkm