SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 55328

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

WRIT PETITION NO.6988/2019 (LB-RES)

BETWEEN:

SMT. K. SUDHAMANI

W/O P.M. SADASHIVAIAH

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

R/AT SHANKARAPURA VILLAGE

GOKUNTE POST, MULBAGAL TALUK

KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI S. VISWESWARAIAH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

KOLAR DISTRICT,KOLAR-563 101.

3.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR-563 101.

4.

THE TAHSILDAR, KOLAR TALUK

KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101.

5.

THE COMMISSIONER

CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

KOLAR CITY-563 101.

...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;

R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

2

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

IMPUGNED

NOTICE

DATED

15.10.2017

ISSUED

BY

R-5

PRODUCED

AT

ANNEXURE-A

BY

ALLOWING

THIS

WRIT

PETITION.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING IN 8B9 GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING:

Notice dated 15.10.2017 was issued by the 5th respondent

calling upon the petitioner to remove the construction by

encroaching the Raja Kaluve by invoking Section 187 of the

Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 (for short `Act'). In

pursuance of the impugned notice issued by the 5th respondent,

the petitioner has submitted a reply with the respondent No.5

stating that the construction put up by the petitioner is not on

the Raja Kaluve, and the construction put up by the petitioner

was in accordance with the sanctioned building plan. However,

the 5th respondent without examining the reply submitted by the

petitioner is proceeding to remove the alleged encroachment

made by the petitioner.

2.

In an identical matter, the learned counsel for the 5th

respondent herein has stated that they would pass appropriate

orders in accordance with law, after consideration of the reply

submitted by the petitioner therein and if necessary will conduct

3

an inspection of the property of the petitioner therein and

determine the existence on the Raja Kaluve. In view of the order

passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in WP

No.54174/2018 (DD 27.8.2021), this writ petition is also required

to be disposed of in the light of the order passed in the said writ

petition. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

i)

Writ petition is disposed of.

ii)

The reply submitted by the petitioner shall be

considered and the proceeding shall be completed within a period

of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this

order.

Till consideration of the reply submitted by the petitioner,

the 5th respondent is hereby restrained from taking any coercive

action against the petitioner in the light of the notice dated

15.10.2017 vide Annexure-A.

All contentions are kept open.

Sd/-

JUDGE

bkm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top