2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 55345
- 1 -
CA No. 8 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SHRI N R RAVI
S/O LATE SHRI N.G. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY,
AGED 60 YEARS,
R/AT NO.292,
8TH CROSS, A.T.H. L/O
SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.
&APPLICANT
(BY SRI DEEPAK & SRI RAJESH S., ADVOCATES)
AND:
THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF
M/S. SEM INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED (IN LIQN.)
ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS,
BENGALURU-560 001.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K S MAHADEVAN., ADVOCATE FOR OL;
SRI P L VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SBI)
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 476
OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, R/W RULE 6 AND 9 OF THE
COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT
TO DIRECT THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR TO HAND POSSESSION OF
THE POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PREMISES TO THE APPLICANT,
AND ETC.,
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
R
Digitally signed
by POORNIMA
SHIVANNA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
CA No. 8 of 2016
1.
The Applicant is before this court seeking for the
following reliefs;
a.
To direct the Official Liquidator to hand over the
possession of the Schedule premises to the
Application in the interest of justice and equity.
b.
To direct the Official liquidator to pay the arrears of
rents from 15.07.2014 to 31.12.2015 which is 14
½ Months which amounts to Rs.13,80,995/- for the
ground floor premises. Any pay future rents till
handing over of possession of the premises.
c.
To direct the Official liquidator to pay the arrears of
rents from 15.07.2014 to 31.12.2015 which
amounts to Rs.13,43,238/- for the First floor
premises. And pay future rents till handing over of
possession of the premises.
d.
Pass
such
other
Order
as
the
nature
and
circumstances of the case may require.
e.
Cost of this application.
2.
The Applicant claims to be the owner of the property
which has been leased out to the Company in
liquidation on 15.05.2008. As per the terms of the
lease agreement, the Company in liquidation had
deposited with the Applicant an interest free
refundable security deposit of Rs.13,63,000/- and in
terms of the lease agreement, certain amount was
- 3 -
required to be paid as monthly lease rental for the
schedule premises.
3.
Though the lease period expired after a period of
eleven months, the Company in liquidation did not
hand over possession of the premises and continued
to occupy the same. Subsequently, the Company in
liquidation stopped payment of rentals and in the
meanwhile, winding up proceedings being filed
before this Court, this Court directed for winding up
of the Company and appointed the Official Liquidator
to take over the assets of the Company, which infact
was taken over on 15.07.2014.
4.
The grievance of the Applicant is that though the
Official Liquidator took over possession of the
premises on 15.07.2014, no rentals have been paid
by the Official Liquidator to the land owner, i.e., the
Applicant and it is in that background, the present
C.A.No.8 of 2016 has been filed seeking for direction
- 4 -
to the Official Liquidator to make payment of the
monies as claimed therein.
5.
During the pendency of the above proceedings, the
possession has been handed over on 08.05.2017.
6.
The claim, which is required to be considered in the
above application is only regards the rentals to be
paid. The Official Liquidator has filed his objections
and a memo contending that the Official Liquidator
cannot be directed to make payment of the rentals
but the claim of the Applicant would be treated as a
preferential claim with the Applicant requiring to
stand in the Queue along with the other creditors of
the Company.
7.
This Court had directed the Applicant to file a claim
before the Official Liquidator for adjudication. The
same came to be adjudicated vide order dated
31.05.2022 wherein the Official Liquidator has
admitted
an
amount
of
Rs.23,30,807/-
as
- 5 -
preferential claim and an amount of Rs.29,98,319/-
as an ordinary claim and rejected an amount of
Rs.25,95,446/-.
8.
The claim of the Applicant was Rs.79,24,572/-, out
of which, an amount of Rs.32,64,820/- was claimed
as past due rentals from April 2010 till 15.07.2014
after giving due deduction to the adjustment of the
security deposit held by the landlord.
9.
Further claim was made from 15.07.2014 to
30.04.2017 as regards the ground floor amounting
to Rs.24,84,759/- after giving due deduction to a
sum of Rs.1,57,826/- being the rental paid by the
Official
Liquidator.
A
further
amount
of
Rs.25,40,494/- was claimed on account of rentals
due towards the first floor from 15.07.2014 to
31.05.2017 after giving due deduction of a sum of
Rs.1,54,952/- being the rentals paid by the Official
Liquidator.
- 6 -
10.
The Official Liquidator being of the opinion that no
amount was required to be paid towards the first
floor as no claim was made towards the first floor till
15.07.2014 has considered that no amount for the
subsequent period is also required to be paid and
has rejected the c