2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36686
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5905/2022
BETWEEN:
SHIYAN @ MOHAMMED SHIYAS,
S/O LATE BASHER,
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
R/O NO.40, 3RD CROSS,
ACHUYTHANAGAR, BENGALURU.
ADDRESS IN FIR
NO.1016, MAHAVEER APARTMENT,
OPP. RAILWAY STATION,
CHIKKABANAVARA, BENGALURU.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI SYED AKBAR PASHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY SOLDEVANAHALLI POLICE,
REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560001.
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI H.S. SHANKAR, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
CRIME NO.92/2022 OF SOLADEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 20(B), 20(B)(I) AND 22(C) OF NDPS ACT AND ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking
regular
bail
of
the
petitioner
in
Crime
No.92/2022
of
Soladevanahalli Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offence
punishable under Sections 20(b), 20(b)(i) and 22(c) of Narcotic
Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (8NDPS Act9 for
short).
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the
respondent-State.
3.
The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is
that
on
credible
information
that
on
parallel
road
of
Chikkabanavara railway station, two persons are selling ganja
and weed oil, upon receiving the information, the respondent
police intimated the same to ACP and secured the panch
witnesses and went and caught hold of accused persons and
they revealed the names of accused Nos.1 and 3 and recovered
ten packets of ganja each weighing 10 grams and 12 small
boxes of weed oil weighing 8 to 10 grams each. Accused Nos.1
and 3 further revealed to the police that they are residing at flat
3
No.1016, 10th floor of Mahaveer Apartment and said that their
friend accused No.2 brings ganja and weed oil and gives to their
other friends accused Nos.4 to 7 and police went to the
apartment and found accused Nos.4 to 7 and recovered 1580
grams of ganja, 960 grams of weed oil and plastic boxes
containing weed oil weighing 2 grams, 5 grams and 10 grams
and in total 154 boxes, total weighing 1188 grams and hence
case has been registered and the matter in under investigation.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
this petitioner has joined the nursing college and he is pursuing I
year nursing and this petitioner was in the friend9s room, but he
has not indulged in any act of trafficking of drug and he is in
custody from 11.05.2022. The learned counsel submits that he
is not having any other criminal antecedents and hence he may
be enlarged on bail.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader
appearing for the respondent/State would submit that the seized
weed oil is 1188 grams and apart from that, ganja was also
seized and the same is weighing 2 grams, 5 grams and 10 grams
in total 154 boxes and all of them have indulged in trafficking of
4
the drug and the matter is under investigation and the very
presence of the petitioner is required for further investigation in
the matter.
6.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for
the respondent-State and also on perusal of the material
available on record, this petitioner was also present along with
accused Nos.4 to 6 when the recovery is made. Accused Nos.1
to 3 revealed that the weed oil and ganja is in the apartment
and the same is a commercial quantity. The offences invoked
against the petitioner is against the Society at large and it
affects the Society and with an intention to curb the menace in
the society, the special enactment is brought into force when the
IPC offences are inadequate. This petitioner had indulged in
keeping the same along with friend. When such being the case,
it requires the personal custodial investigation of this petitioner
and at this juncture, when the investigation is not yet
completed, it is not a fit case to exercise the powers under
Section 439 of Cr.P.C. However, this Court can consider the
5
same after filing of the charge-sheet and liberty is given to the
petitioner to approach the Court after filing of the charge-sheet.
7.
In view of the discussions made above, I pass the
following:
ORDER
The petition is rejected. However, liberty is given to the
petitioner to approach the Court after filing of the charge-sheet.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MD