- 1 -
CRL.P No. 6103 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6103 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. CHANDRU H N
S/O SRI NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT 6 1ST MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS HEBBULI VENKATAPPA GALLI
PARVATHIPURA
BANGALORE - 560 004.
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SATHISH V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY S.H.O.
KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT POLICE STATION
BANGALORE CITY
REPRESENTED BY THE
LEARNED SPP HIGH COURT
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SRI KODLU RAMAKRISHNA
S/O HOOVAPPAGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 52
2ND MAIN ROAD,
BIKASIPURA ISRO LAYOUT
BENGALURU - 560078
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.K.S. ABHIJITH.,HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. M.B. RAVIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.36709/2021 PENDING
Digitally signed by
PADMAVATHI B K
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 6103 of 2022
ON THE FILE OF XXX ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE,
BENGALURU
CITY
FOR
THE
OFFENCE
P/U/S.384,420,465,468,471 AND 506 OF IPC REGISTERED BY
THE KUMARSWAMY LAYOUT POLICE STATION.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed calling in question the proceedings
in C.C.No.36709/2021, pending before the XXX Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru for the offences
punishable under Sections 384, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 506
of IPC.
The parties to the lis have several cases between
themselves, all pertaining to issuance of cheques and it
being dishonoured. The accused are acquitted of all the
offences which were alleged to be punishable under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant had
challenged the same before this Court in Criminal Appeal
No.536/2016 and Criminal Appeal No.280/2016, which are
withdrawn by the complainant on a joint memo being filed
and accepted by this Court in the aforesaid cases.
- 3 -
3.
In the case at hand as well, the parties have filed
a joint memo of settlement, which reads as follows:
"Joint Memo
The petitioner and 2nd respondent humbly
submits as follows.
1.
It is submitted that the petitioner filed the
above case to Quash the Proceedings in CC
No.36709/2021 pending on the file of the XXX
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, At
Bengaluru city for the offences punishable
under sections 384,420,465,468,471 and 506
of IPC registered by the Kumaraswamy layout
Police station.
2.
The
Petitioner
respectfully
submits,
the
Petitioner and 2nd Respondent settled all the
cases pending against each other and filed
joint
memo
dated
26.07.2016
in
C.C.No.5913/2013 on the file of XX ACMM,
Bengaluru city and in the joint memo stated
that the Petitioner has to withdraw the cases
filed before high court of Karnataka in Crl.Apl
No. 536/2016 and Crl.Apl. No. 280/2016.
3.
The
Petitioner
respectfully
submits,
the
Petitioner and 2nd Respondent in Criminal
- 4 -
Appeal No. 280/2016 filed joint memo stating
that the Respondent No.2 has to co-operate
with the petitioner in order to close the
C.C.No.36709/2021
pending
before
the
Hon'ble XXX ACMM, Bengaluru.
4.
Further submits that the both petitioner and
Respondent No.2 has undertaken they will not
file case or interfere each other in future.
Wherefore the Petitioner and Respondent No.2
humbly pray that this Hon'ble Court may be
pleased
to
accept
the
Joint
memo
and
consequently to Quash the Proceedings in CC No.
36709/2021 pending on the file of XXX Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, At Bengaluru City
for
the
offences
punishable
under
sections
384,420,465,468,471 and 506 of IPC registered by
Kumaraswamy Layout Police station in the interest
of justice and equity."
4.
The offences alleged are identical to those that
were alleged in the aforesaid criminal appeal before this
Court in Crl.A.No.280/2016. Therefore, in the light of the
acquittal, a given quietus to the dispute between the parties
by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the said appeal, I
- 5 -
deem it appropriate to accept the joint memo filed by the
petitioner and the respondent No.2.
5.
It is also germane to notice that on perusal of the
complaint and the charge sheet, not even an iota of evidence
is found to drive home the offence under Section 383 of the
IPC, which deals with extortion as punishable under Section
384 of IPC.
6.
For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
(i)
Criminal Petition is disposed.
(ii)
Impugned proceedings in C.C.No.36709/2021
pending
before
the
XXX
Additional
Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru shall stand
quashed qua the petitioner.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.