SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
VEDAMURTHY S/O HADAPADA KALASAPPA – Appellant
Versus
GURAMMA ALIAS GURUBASAMMA W/O LATE HADAPADA VEERABHADRAPPA – Respondent


The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the

following reliefs:

a) Issue an order or direction or writ in the nature of certiorari,

quashing the impugned order I.A.No.22 dated 04.03.2022

passed by the learned Civil Judge & JMFC, Siruguppa, in

O.S.No.32/2013, vide Annexure-L, by allowing the I.A. as

prayed for.

b) Pass other appropriate order whichever deems fit to this

Hon’ble Court, under the facts and circumstances of the

case.

The suit in O.S.No.32/2013 has been filed seeking

for a declaration that the plaintiffs are the absolute

owners of the suit schedule property to an extent of

3.43 acres, directing the defendant to execute a

rectified registered sale deed with correct survey

number etc.

When the matter was posted for cross-examination

of DW2 an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of Code

of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed seeking for

amendment

of

the

plaint

in

the

amendment

application, there are three amendments which have

been sought for, namely:

- 5 -

i)

Correction of the date of sale deed from

29.06.1997 to 29.06.1977.

ii)

Correction of an extent of land from 3.42

acres to 4.50 acres and;

iii)

Substitution of the schedule plaint.

The said application having been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top