HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
,
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
MANIKANTHA @MANI S/O. CHANTRAPATHI SHIVAJI – Respondent
The State through Rural Police Station Hosapete in
Ballary District has filed this appeal under Section 378(1) and
(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred
to as ‘Cr.P.C.’ for short) challenging the judgment of acquittal
passed by the learned III Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Ballari sitting at Hospete in S.C.No.136/2013, dated
09.09.2016
whereby
the
learned
Sessions
Judge
has
acquitted the accused/respondent herein for the offence
3
punishable under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code, 1860
(hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’ for short).
For the sake of convenience, the parties herein
are referred to with their original ranks occupied by them
before the Trial Court.
Brief factual matrix leading to the case is as
under:
That PW-2 Nagamma is the mother-in-law of the
complainant and on 20.02.2013, the husband of the
complainant had gone to Shiradi while complainant had gone
to Koppal along with her children to attend a marriage
ceremony at about 8 a.m. It is alleged that PW-2 Nagamma
alone was in the house and on that day, at 2.30 p.m. when
the mother-in-law of the complainant PW2 Nagamma was
alone in the house situated within the jurisdiction of Hospete
R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.