1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
WRIT PETITION No.35587 OF 2017 (GM-RES)
CONNECTED WITH
WRIT PETITION No.20564 OF 2019 (GM-RES)
IN WRIT PETITION No.35587 OF 2017
BETWEEN
MR HARIRAJ SHETTY
S/O B VASANTHRAM SHETTY,
AGED 53 YEARS,
NO.15, BASEMENT,
CUNNIGHAM ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI SANKET M YENAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560001.
2 . THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
INFANTRY ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
CENTRAL DIVISION
BENGALURU CITY - 560 001.
2
4.
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
ASHOK NAGAR POLICE STATION
BENGALURU - 560 001.
5.
SRI. M.S. RAMESH RAO
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CITY CRIME BRANCH
N.T. PETE
BENGALURU - 560 001.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4
R5 SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH
SECTION
482
OF
CR.P.C
PRAYING
TO
DECLARE
THAT
IMPLICATING THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO.305 OF 2017 OF
ASHOKNAGAR
POLICE
STATION
FOR
THE
OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 79 AND 80 OF KARNATAKA
POLICE ACT 1963 AND SECTIONS 332, 336, 353, 506(B) OF
IPC, IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THIS COURT
AND WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY OF LAW.
IN WRIT PETITION No.20564 OF 2019
BETWEEN
MR HARIRAJ SHETTY
S/O B VASANTHRAM SHETTY,
AGED 55 YEARS,
NO.15, BASEMENT,
CUNNIGHAM ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI SANKET M YENAGI, ADVOCATE)
3
AND
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001,
REP BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS.
2 . THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CUBBON PARK POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU CITY,
BENGALURU - 560 001
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH
SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO PROHIBIT THE LEARNED
8TH ADDL. CMM COURT FROM EXERCISING ANY JURISDICTION,
POWER OR AUTHORITY IN RESPECT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF
C.C.NO.13838/2015
IN
PURSUANCE
TO
FIR
IN
CRIME
NO.0200/2014;
QUASH
ALL
THE
PROCEEDINGS
OF
C.C.NO.13838/2015 PENDING BEFORE THE LEARNED 8TH
ADDL. CMM COURT IN PURSUANCE TO FIR IN CRIME
NO.0200/2014 AT ANNEXURE-C. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO
STAY ALL THE PROCEEDINGS OF C.C.NO.13838/2015 PENDING
BEFORE THE LEARNED 8TH ADDL. CMM COURT IN PURSUANCE
TO FIR IN CRIME NO.0200/2014.
THESE
WRIT
PETITIONS
ARE
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT
MADE THE FOLLOWING:
4
W.P.No.35587/2017 is filed by the petitioner-
accused No.3 under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
for quashing the FIR in Crime No.305/2017 registered
by Ashok Nagar Police Station for the offences
punishable under Sections 79 and 80 of Karnataka
Police Act 1963 and Sections 332, 336, 353, 506 (b)
of IPC pending on the file of XLIII Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate at Mayo Hall, Bangalore.
2. W.P.No.20564/2019 is filed by the same
petitioner/accused (who is accused No.1 in Crime
No.200/2014) under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C
for quashing the criminal proceedings registered by
the Cubbon Park police station in Crime No.200/2014
for the offences punishable under Section 188 of IPC
and under Sections 78 (B) and 79 of the Karnataka
5
Police Act, 1963 pending before 8th ACMM, Bengaluru
in CC.No.13838/2015.
3. Both the petitions are filed by the same
petitioner and the issues involved is common in
nature, therefore taken together for common disposal.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner in
both the cases and learned HCGP for State.
The
case
of
the
petitioner
in
W.P.No.35587/2017, is that the CCB police received a
credible information on 27.07.2017 that there was
video game gambling which was running at New Royal
Tech Recreation Association Club, Residency Road,
Bangalore. Therefore, after obtaining the permission
of the Magistrate and obtaining search warrant from
the higher officials the police along with the witnesses
raided the spot at "Empire Estate Building, No.56,
New Royal tech Recreation Association, Residency
6
Road, Bengaluru, where they found about 7 to 8
persons were involved in video gambling and also they
were disturbing the public peace and tranquility. After
entering the place they found some of the persons
and the police asked them to stand by the side of the
room and at that time accused No.1-Jamphel Dorjee
took up a pistol and pointed towards the Sub-
Inspector and threatened to leave them and also he
said to have obstructed the public servant while
discharging the duty by creating fear of causing
injury. Subsequently, the Sub-Inspector fired through
his gun towards the ground and thereafter accused
No.1 surrendered and on verification the said pistol
held by accused No.1, is said to be a toy pistol used
as lighter. Subsequently, all the accused persons were
arrested and on enquiry it was revealed by them that
this petitioner is the owner of club, therefore FIR has
been lodged by the police for the above said offences
7
against the petitioner as accused No.3 and he was
shown as absconding, which is under challenge.
6. In W.P.No.20564/2019 one Naveen Supekar-
Police Officer filed Suo-moto complaint and alleged
that on 19.09.2014 at 8.30 p.m. when he was on
patrolling
duty
at
Cubbon
Park
and
received
information that at No.10, Brigade Road, Ground
Floor,
5th
Avenue,
Bengaluru
at
Fantastic-3
Recreation Club they were running gambling and this
police immediately went along with panchas and
obtained the permission from higher authority for
search warrant and went to the spot at 8:55 PM and
observed some persons were playing the games by
showing names of Adidas, Puma, Fila, Nika, Reebok,
Joker with assurance to pay more than double the
money by playing the gambling. Immediately, the
police arrested 17 members, out of them, some of
them were club members and some of them were non
8
club members. The articles were seized and registered
in Crime No.200/2014 for the offences punishable
under Section 188 of IPC and Sections 78(B) and 79
of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred as
KP Act) which is under challenge and also filed charge
sheet, which is also under challenge
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has
contended
that
the
offences
punishable
under
Sections 78 (B) and 79 of KP Act, are non-cognizable
offences and the police have no authority to register
FIR and also investigate the m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.