The present appeal is filed challenging the order passed

by the learned XLVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge

and Special Judge for CBI cases, dated 08.09.2011 in Special

(Corruption) Case Number 212/2004.

2.

Brief facts of the case are as under:

Allegations leveled against the appellant by the

prosecution is that, present appellant is the son of second

accused in the very same case G. Siddabasava, who was

working as a Survey Assistant in the office of the survey of

India, KGDC Koramangala, Bengaluru. During the year 2003

there was a notification for recruitment of 15 posts of Topo

Trainee Type 3 B (plain tabler). Accordingly, accused No.2 in

order to get a job for his son who is the appellant, though

the

appellant

did

not

possess

required

qualification,

manipulated the documents with an intention to secure the

job, hatched conspiracy with other accused, applied for the

3

said post and some how, recruited into the said post. Later

on, on verification of the documents furnished by the

appellant, it is revealed that the documents produced by the

appellant was a fake marks card issued by the alleged

Sarvothama Prathiksha Kendra for Correspondence insofar as

the II PUC is