SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 210

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BHAVANKUMAR JHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Heard Shri Avinash M. Angadi, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and Shri Ramesh Chigari, the

learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2.

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question

the proceedings in Sessions Case No.5029/2021 pending before

the V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad, sitting at

Hubballi, registered for the offence punishable under Section

302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3.

The only ground of challenge to the proceedings is,

the investigating agency not furnishing the entire evidence

produced against the petitioner. The petitioner is accused

committing murder on 18.2.2020, of one Momahhed Nadim

S/o.Mohammed Haroon. The Investigating Officer submits the

3

charge sheet in S.C.No.5029/2021 at which point in time

produced a CCTV footage and a report on the said CCTV

footage. The entire report is not made available to the

petitioner.

4.

A truncated version being handed over to the

petitioner, drives the petitioner to file an application under

Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The trial

Court having rejected the said application, drives the petitioner

to this Court in the subject petition. The order of the tri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top