2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37790
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.13076 OF 2022 (LA-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. G. PARASMALPORWAL
S/O K. GHISULALPORWAL
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT NO.61, PORWALSADAN
RAMA IYENGAR ROAD,
NEAR EURO KIDS SCHOOL,
V.V. PURAM,
BENGALURU-560 004.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKAR NARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. GOUTHAM CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
NH-275, BANGALORE – MYSORE SECTION,
VIDYANAGAR, MANDYA-571 401.
2. MR. H.L. CHANDRU,
MAJOR,
S/O. SRI.C. BORAIAH,
BIDADI VILLAGE,
BIDADI HOBLI,
RAMNAGAR TALUK,
RAMNAGAR DISTRICT-562 109.
3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NHAI,
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT,
BASAVANAPURA (RAMADEVARAPADA)
RAMANAGARA-562 128.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SHRUTI C. CHAGANTI, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & 3;
SRI. M.R. RAJAGOPAL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. BASAVARAJU H.N., ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
2
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDER
DTD 05.02.2022 VIDE ANNX-B1, THE NOTICE DTD 07.02.2022 VIDE
ANNX-C1 AND THE COMMUNICATION DTD 07.02.2022 VIDE ANNX-D1
ISSUED BY THE R-1 TO THE MANAGER, KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK,
VISWESHWARAPURAM BRANCH, WITH RESPECT TO BANK ACCOUNT
OF THE PETITIONER VIZ., ACCOUNT NAME CALA CUM SLAO
RAMANAGARA NH 275 AND PD NHAI PIU RAMANAGRA, BANK NAME
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK, BIDADI BRANCH, ACCOUNT NO.1612042839
AND ETC.
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT
MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
In this petition, the petitioner has sought for the
following reliefs:
(i)
Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate
writ, direction or order to quash/set aside the
Order dated 05.02.2022 (Annexure-B1), the
Notice dated 07.02.2022 (Annexure-C1) and the
communication dated 07.02.2022 (Annexure-D1)
issued by the Respondent Nos.1 to the Manager,
Kotak
Mahindra
Bank,
Visweshwarapuram
Branch, with respect to Bank Account of the
Petitioner viz., Account Name: CALA CUM
SLAO RAMANAGARA NH 275 & PD NHAI PIU
RAMANAGARA, Bank Name: Kotak Mahindra
Bank, Bidadi Branch, Account No.1612042839.
(ii)
Issue a writ of mandamus or any other
appropriate writ, direction or order directing the
Respondent No.1 to operationalize the Account
Name: CALA CUM SLAO RAMANAGARA NH
275 & PD NHAI PIU RAMANAGARA, Bank
3
Name: Kotak Mahindra Bank, Bidadi Branch,
Account No.1612042839.
(iii)
Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the
Respondent No.1 to strictly follow the provisions
of section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act
1956 and refer the dispute to the Principal
District & Sessions Court, Ramanagara, in order
to determine as to who is entitled to receive the
compensation amount in respect of acquired
portions of property bearing Sy.No.87/2 Hejjala
Village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramnagar Taluk belonging
to the Petitioner.
(iv)
Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the
Respondent No.1 that in the event of petitioner
succeeding in the dispute between him and the
Respondent No.2 before the Principal District &
Sessions Court, Ramanagara, to pass a general
award and make payment of the same to the
petitioner, without waiting for recovering the
same from respondent No.2 with liberty to the
Respondent No.1 to recover the amount from
Respondent No.2 as also initiate such action as
permitted under law against respondent No.2.
(v)
Issue any other writ or order or directions, as this
Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and
circumstances of the case and in the interest of
justice and equity.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner,
learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and Sri. M.R.
4
Rajagopal, learned Senior counsel for respondent No.2 and
perused the material on record.
3.
In
addition
to
reiterating
the
various
contentions urged in the Memorandum of Petition and
referring to the documents produced by the petitioner,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on
07.02.2022, respondent Nos.1 and 3-National Highways
Authority of India (NHAI) addressed a communication to the
Kotak
Mahindra
Bank,
Visweshwarapuram
Branch,
Bengaluru, where the petitioner has savings account
bearing Account No.142010112999 at Annexure-D1, in
which a sum of Rs.81,24,250/- was deposited by the
authorities informing the bank to freeze the said bank
account of the petitioner. Pursuant to the same, the
aforesaid Kotak Mahindra Bank has proceeded to attach
the bank account of the petitioner. Subsequently, the
petitioner in addition to requesting the respondent-
authorities as well as the aforesaid Bank to defreeze the
account, also submitted a representation dated 14.03.2022
to the respondents as well as an application under Section
5
3-H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956 (for short “the
said
Act
of
1956”)
to
determine
the
entitlement,
apportionment and payment of compensation in view of the
inter se dispute between the petitioner and respondent
No.2, who is also a rival claimant in respect of the said
compensation. It is the grievance of the petitioner that
despite their existing a live and pending dispute between
the petitioner and respondent No.2 as regards payment,
apportionment and entitlement of compensation, instead of
referring the dispute to the competent Civil Court for
adjudication, respondent Nos.1 and 3 have proceeded to
pass the impugned order at Annexure-B1 rejecting the
claim of the petitioner and upholding the claim of
respondent No.2 and as such, the petitioner is before this
Court by way of the present petition.
4.
Per
contra,
learned
Senior
co