SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 56971

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI. SRINIVASMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
SRI. M. NAGARAJ – Respondent


The captioned writ petition is filed questioning

the order of the learned Judge passed on I.A.No.4

filed by defendant No.2 under Order 26 Rule 9 read

with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code.

2. The present petitioner - plaintiff has instituted

a bare suit for injunction in O.S.No.524/2022. The

petitioner

has

alleged

that

the

respondents

-

defendants attempted to encroach over the suit

property. On receipt of summons, the respondents -

defendants have tendered appearance and have filed

written statement, thereby have stoutly denied the

entire averments made in the plaint. The respondents

3

- defendants have also set up a counter claim seeking

relief of perpetual injunction against the present

petitioner - plaintiff. The respondents - defendants

contended that the suit schedule property is not at all

in existence and the said contention is specifically

raised in the written statement. The defendants

apprehension is that the plaintiff under the garb of

asserting possessory rights is directly laying a false

claim over the defendants property i.e., site No.307.

It is in this background, the respondents - defendants

were compelled to file present application in I.A.No.4

seeking app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top