1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200113/2019
Between:
1.
Sri. Syed Sha Taki Peeran
S/o. Sayed Sha Iqbal Peera Hussaini,
Aged about 42 years,
Occ: Sajjada Nasheen,
2.
Smt. Syeda Ayisha Fatima Taki Peeran,
W/o Syed Sha Taki Peeran Hussaini Kazmi,
Aged about 30 years, Occ: Household work,
3.
Syed Ali Peera S/o Hakeem Sayed Sha Iqbal
Peera Hussaini Kazmi,
Aged about 31 years, Occ: Business,
Petitioners-1 to 3 all are
R/o. Arcot Darga, Near Jamiya Masjid.
4.
Nasiruddin @ Naseer S/o Babusab Takke,
Aged about 47 years, Occ: Business,
R/o Shahpur Darwaja, Vijayapur-586101.
… Petitioners
(By Sri S.S.Mamadapur, Advocate)
2
And:
1.
The State of Karnataka,
Through the Police Sub-Inspector,
Roja Police Station, Kalaburagi,
Rep. by its State Public Prosecutor,
Advocate General’s Office,
High Court Building,
Kalaburagi-585101.
2.
Sri. Syed Kareem Mohammed Hussaini
S/o Sajjada Syed Iqbal Peeran Hussaini,
Aged about 29 years, Occ: Nil,
R/o Peer Bangali Layout, Ring Road,
Kalaburagi-585101.
… Respondents
(By Sri Shivakumar Tengli, AGA for R1;
By Sri. M.A.Jagirdar, Advocate for
Sri.G.B.Yadav, Advocate for R2)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., praying to quash the entire proceedings in
C.C.No.6642/2018 pending on the file of the Hon’ble Civil
Judge & JMFC, Kalaburagi, for the offences punishable
under Section 109, 504, 506 R/w Section 34 of the Indian
Penal Code.
This petition coming on for Hearing this day, the
Court passed the following:
The petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 4 are before this
Court seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated
against them in Crime No.164/2017 of Roza police station,
3
Kalaburagi which is now pending in C.C.No.6642/2018 on
the file of learned Civil Judge and JMFC, Kalaburagi, for the
offences punishable under Sections 109, 504 and 506 read
with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’).
2.
Brief facts of the case are that respondent
No.2 filed first information with Roza police station alleging
commission of above said offences. It is stated that on
07.09.2017 he had received a call from two cell phones of
the accused threatening the informant and his three elder
sisters and their children, by abusing them in filthy
language. The other three accused were also standing by
the side of accused No.4 in threatening the informant and
his family members. Therefore, he requested the police to
register a case and to initiate legal action against them.
3.
Accordingly, the Station House Officer at Roza
police station forwarded the requisition dated 30.12.2017
to the learned Magistrate requesting permission to
investigate into the non-cognizable offence. After obtaining
permission from the learned Magistrate, FIR was registered
4
and the investigation was undertaken. It is stated that
after completing investigation, the charge sheet is filed for
the offences punishable under Sections 109, 504 and 506
read with Section 34 of IPC. Learned Magistrate took
cognizance of the offences and the criminal proceedings is
pending in C.C.No.6642/2018 on the file of learned Civil
Judge and JMFC, Kalaburagi.
4.
Accused Nos.1 to 4 have approached this Court
invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section
482 of Cr.P.C., to quash the entire criminal proceedings
initiated against them.
5.
Heard Sri S.S.Mamadapur, learned counsel for
the
petitioners,
Sri
M.A.Jagirdar,
learned
counsel
appearing
for
Sri
G.B.Yadav,
learned
counsel
for
respondent No.2 and Sri Shivakumar R. Tengli, learned
Additional Government Advocate for the respondent No.1 –
State. Perused the material on record.
6.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted
that petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 4. They have not
5
committed any offence as alleged. A false complaint came
to be filed against them. Initially FIR was registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 504 and 506 of IPC.
The charge sheet was filed for the offences punishable
under Sections 109 along with Sections 504 and 506 of
IPC. All these offences are non-cognizable offences.
Section 155 of Cr.P.C. contemplates the procedure that is
to be followed when information regarding commission of
non-cognizable offence is received. Even though, it is
stated that requisition was submitted to the learned
Magistrate seeking permission to investigate into the
matter, the learned Magistrate has not applied his mind to
the requisition but only endorsed as ‘permitted’ on the
requisition dated 30.12.2017.
7.
Learned counsel further submitted that this
Court has already held in Vaggeppa Gurulinga Jangaligi
vs. State of Karnataka1 that procedure as contemplated
under Section 155 of Cr.P.C., is to be complied in letter
and spirit. It is also held that passing the order by writing
1 2020 (1) KCCR 371
6
a single word ‘permitted’ or ‘permitted to investigate’ is not
an order in the eye of law. Therefore, permission said to
have been obtained in the present case is not helpful to
the prosecution. The procedure adopted is vitiated by law
and therefore, the entire proceedings is liable to be
quashed. Hence, he prays for allowing the petition.
8.
Learned Additional Government Advocate for
respondent No.1 fairly concedes that the order dated
30.12.2017 passed by the learned Magistrate is a single
word order i.e. ‘permitted’. Therefore, the decision in
Veggeppa’s case (supra) is applicable to the facts of the
case. Accordingly, he fairly submits that appropriate orders
may be passed.
9.
Per contra, learned counsel for respondent
No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.