1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.19203 OF 2021(GM-PASS)
BETWEEN:
SMT. KASTURI RAJUPETA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
W/O SRI. C SHIVAKUMAR REDDY,
NO.14, <RAMANASHREE=,
29TH MAIN, BTM LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU 3 560 076.
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C V NAGESH, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W
SRI. AJAY KADKOL T, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS,
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU BHAVAN, 23-D,
JANPATH, NEW DELHI 3 110 011.
2. THE JOINT SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS,
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU BHAVAN, 23-D,
JANPATH, NEW DELHI 3 110 011.
3. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER,
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE,
8TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD,
KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU 3 560 095.
& RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H, ASG)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
DIRECT
REVERSING
AND
SETTING
ASIDE
THE
ORDER/ENDORSEMENT DTD.6.9.2021 PASSED BY THE
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER KORAMANGALA BENGLAURU
i.e THE R-3 HEREIN REJECTING THE APPLICATION FOR
R
2
RENEWAL OF THE PASSPORT BEARING NO.Z2247510 FILED
BY THE PETITIONER WITH A FURTHER DIRECTION TO
CONSIDER HER REQUEST FOR THE RENEWAL/ISSUANCE OF
THE PASSPORT AND TO GRANT THE SAME IN THE EVENT OF
SHE BEING OTHERWISE ENTITLED FOR THE SAME VIDE
ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR ORDER THIS DAY, THE COURT PRONOUNCED THE
FOLLOWING:
Petitioner-lady is knocking at the doors of writ Court
seeking invalidation of the Endorsement dated 06.09.2021
(Annexure-A) issued by the respondent-Regional Passport
Officer and for a direction to consider her application for
renewal of the passport, which has since expired. The
Endorsement reads as under:
<To,
KASTURI RAJUPETA,
W/O SHIVAKUMAR REDDY CHENNAREDDY,
NO.14, RAMANASHREE,
29TH MAIN,BTM LAYOUT, II STAGE,
BENGALURU 3 560 076.
KARNATAKA, INDIA.
Subject:
Clarifications
required
regarding
issuance
of
Passport
facilities
to
Shri/Smt/Kumari/Master
KASTURI
RAJUPETA.
This is in reference to your application for
reissue, with file number BN1073465217721
dated 22/7/2021.
You are requested to submit the final
disposal order of the case that is pending
against you, to process your application for a
full validity passport.
3
Alternatively, you may submit permission
from the concerned Court for reissue of
passport/travel abroad. The validity of the
passport so issued would be subject to
conditions mentioned in the court order as per
gazette
notification
GSR
570(E)
dated
25/08/1993.
Please
quote
the
reference
number
mentioned in the top block of this letter for
further correspondence.=
2. After service of notice, the respondents having
entered appearance through the learned ASG resist the
writ petition by filing the Statement of Objections on
18.11.2021 principally contending that a criminal case is
pending against the petitioner and therefore she should
obtain and produce a facilitative order at the hands of the
learned Judge of the said Court, so that her application for
renewal of passport may be favourably considered. So
contending, learned ASG seeks dismissal of the writ
petition.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties
and having perused the petition papers, this Court is
inclined to grant indulgence in the matter as under and for
the following reasons:
4
(a) The Right to travel is an inviolable human right
enshrined
under
Article
13
of
the
UNIVERSAL
DECLERATION
OF
HUMAN
RIGHTS.
Under
our
Constitution, the Right to travel abroad is held to be a
facet of fundamental right to life & liberty guaranteed
under Article 21 vide MANEKA GANDHI vs. UNION OF
INDIA AIR 1978 SC 597. The Apex court relying on the
opinion of Justice William O. Douglas in the case of KENT
v. DULLES 357 US 116 (1958) observed: <&Mr. Justice
Douglas said in Kent v. Dulles that 8freedom of movement
across frontiers in either direction, and inside frontiers as
well, was a part of our heritage. Travel abroad like travel
within the country, may be necessary for livelihood. It may
be as close to the heart of the individual as the choice of
what he eats, (1) [1950] S.C.R. 594 or wears, or reads.
Freedom of movement is basic in our Scheme of values.9 And
what the learned Judge, said in regard to freedom of
movement in his country holds good in our country as well.
Freedom of movement has been a part of our ancient
tradition which always upheld the dignity of man and saw
in him the embodiment of the Divine&=
(b) To go abroad, one needs Travel Documents
namely, a Passport issued by his native country and the
5
Visa that may be issued by the host country. At this
juncture, it would be profitable to trace the historical and
etymological origin of the use and nature of passports. The
word Passport is derived from a French word, 8passer9
(circa 15), literally meaning authorization to depart from
the port. The word Visa is derived from Latin 8videre9 (mid
19th century), which means 8to see9, i.e., to see a place. The
Madras High Court in V.G ROW vs. STATE OF MADRAS
AIR 1954 Mad 240 has succinctly traced the history of the
passport at paragraph 11 as under:
<&11. Historically, the original meaning of the
term "passport" appears to have been different
from the modern sense. It was evidently a rule
of common law in the 14th and 15th centuries
in England that no subject could leave the
realm without a license or passport. This was
founded on th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.