2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 43960
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5784/2022
BETWEEN:
VIJAY PRABHAKARAN @ VIJAY
S/O. LOGANATHAN,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
R/AT 2ND CROSS,
NEAR INDIRA CANTEEN,
KUPPAM STREET, D.J.HALLY,
BENGALURU CITY.
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI NARAYANA SWAMY M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY
KADUGONDANAHALLY P.S, BENGALURU,
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560001.
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
CR.NO.135/2022 REGISTERED BY KADUGONDANAHALLI POLICE
STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S. 21(b) AND
8(C) OF N.D.P.S. ACT.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking
regular bail of the petitioner/accused in Crime No.135/2022 of
Kadugondana Halli Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offence
punishable under Sections 21(b) and 8(C) of NDPS Act.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the
respondent-State.
3.
The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is
that this petitioner along with other accused on 13.04.2022 at
16.00 hours, when information was received that the petitioner
and another person are indulging in selling MDMA, went along
with other staff and apprehended this petitioner, who is accused
No.1 and accused No.2 ran away from the spot and while
apprehending this petitioner, he fell down and sustained simple
injuries and after apprehending him, recovery is made to the
3
tune of 11 grams of MDMA and the matter is under investigation
and accused No.2 is yet to be apprehended.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
this petitioner is in custody from 13.04.2022 and there are no
other criminal antecedents against the petitioner. The counsel
would also submit that the MDMA seized is only 11 grams i.e., 1
gram higher than the commercial quantity and no need of
further custodial investigation and already recovery is made at
the instance of this petitioner. Hence, he may be enlarged on
bail.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader
for the respondent-State would submit that MDMA is a
manufactured drug and 11 grams of MDMA is seized which is one
1 gram higher than the commercial quantity and though he is
not having criminal antecedents, his presence is required and
the accused No.2 is yet to be arrested. Hence, there is a prima
facie case against the petitioner herein.
4
6.
Having heard the respective counsel and also on
perusal of the material available on record, the prosecution
material discloses that this petitioner was apprehended with 11
grams of MDMA, which is a manufactured drug and accused No.2
has escaped from the spot according to the prosecution and this
petitioner is in custody from 13.04.2022 and no other criminal
antecedents against this petitioner indulging in committing
similar offence of selling MDMA. When such being the facts and
circumstances and taking note of the fact that the quantum of
MDMA seized is only 11 grams i.e., 1 gram higher than the
commercial quantity, it is a fit case to exercise the powers under
Section 439 of Cr.P.C. directing the petitioner to co-operate with
the Investigating Officer for investigation, subject to imposing
certain conditions to protect and safeguard the interest of the
prosecution. Hence, I pass the following:-
ORDER
The
Petition
is
allowed.
Consequently,
the
petitioner/accused
shall
be
released
on
bail
in
Crime
No.135/2022 of Kadugondana Halli Police Station, Bengaluru
5
City, for the offence punishable under Sections 21(b) and 8(C) of
NDPS Act, subject to the following conditions:
(i)
The petitioner shall execute personal bond for
a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs
only) with two sureties for the like-sum to the
satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.
(ii)
The petitioner shall not indulge in tampering
the prosecution witnesses.
(iii)
The
petitioner
shall
appear
before
the
jurisdictional Court on all the future hearing
dates, unless exempted by the Court for any
genuine cause.
(iv)
The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of
the Trial Court without prior permission of the
Court, till the case registered against him is
disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST