2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 30909
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I. ARUN
W.P. No.14891 OF 2020 (T-RES)
BETWEEN:
TAGHAR VASUDEVA AMBRISH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S/O SRI. VASUDEVA T A
R/AT NO.8/2, 36TH CROSS
11TH-A-MAIN, 4TH-T-BLOCK
JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU 560011.
... PETITIONER
(BY MR. ARVIND DATAR, SR. COUNSEL FOR
MRS. NAYANA TARA B.G. ADV., &
MR. RAHUL UNNIKRISHNAN, ADV.,)
AND:
1.
APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING
KARNATAKA
6TH FLOOR
VINIJA THERIGE KARYALAYA
KALIDASA ROAD
GANDHINAGAR
BENGALURU 560009.
2.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX
BANGALORE SOUTH
1, CK JAFFER SHARIEF ROAD
VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU 560001.
R
2
3.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
LGSTO-90, MM TRUST BUILDING
CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU 560018.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. HEMA KUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R3
MR. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, SPL. COUNSEL FOR R2)
- - -
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
DTD.31.8.2020 PASSED BY R-2 AND PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-Q.
DIRECT R-2 AND 3 TO APPLY SL NO.13 OF NOTIFICATION
NO.9/2017 INTEGRATED TAX (RATE) DTD.28.7.2017 TO THE
PETITIONER AND CLASSIFY THE SERVICE PROVIDED BY HIM AS
SERVICES BY WAY OF RENTING OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING FOR
USE AS RESIDENCE WHICH ATTRACTS NIL RATE OF TAX. GRANT
AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE ORDER
DTD.31.8.2020 PASSED BY R-1 AT ANNEXURE-Q AND DIRECT THE
R-2 AND 3 NOT TO TAKE ANY COERCIVE ACTION PURSUANT TO
THE
IMPUGNED
DTD.31.8.2020
PASSED
BY
R-1
ANNEXURE-Q.
THIS W.P. HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
ORDERS ON 03.02.2022, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF
ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this writ petition, the solitary question which arises
for consideration is whether the service provided by
petitioner i.e., leasing of residential premises as hostel to
students and working professionals is covered under Entry 13
of Notification No.9/2017 dated 28.09.2017 namely 'Services
by way of renting of residential dwelling for use as residence'
3
issued under Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. The factual background in which the aforesaid
question
arises
for
consideration
need
mention.
The
petitioner is co-owner of a residential property situate in
Bengaluru. The property is a residential property having 42
rooms in all spread out between a stilt floor, ground floor and
four floors along with terrace and common areas. The
petitioner along with other co-owners have executed a lease
deed in favour of the lessee namely M/s.D Twelve Spaces
Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the lessee') on
21.06.2019. The lessee has leased out the residential
property as Hostel for providing long term accommodation to
students and working professionals with the duration of stay
ranging from 3 months to 12 months.
3. The Central Government has issued notification
No.9/2017 - Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017
(hereinafter referred to as 'exemption notification') and has
4
granted exemption from payment of goods and services in
respect of services mentioned therein which includes renting
services which are provided with respect to residential
dwelling for use as residence.
4. The petitioner with a view to seek clarification with
regard to his eligibility to seek exemption on the rent
received by him from the lessee by letting the property, filed
an Advance Ruling application in prescribed form under
Section 97 of the Act before the Authority for Advance
Ruling,
Karnataka
(hereinafter
referred
to
as
'AAR
Karnataka'). The AAR Karnataka vide Advance Ruling dated
23.03.2020 inter alia held that services viz., renting of
residential dwelling for use as a residence do not fall under
Entry 13 of the Exemption Notification. It was further held
that lessee itself is not using the accommodation. Thus, it
was held that the petitioner has to charge Goods and
Services Tax (hereinafter referred to as 'GST') while issuing
invoice to the lessee provided it is registered under the Act.
Accordingly, it was held that benefit of exemption notification
is not available to the petitioner.
5
5. The petitioner thereupon filed an appeal under
Section 100 of the Act before the Appellate Authority for
Advance Ruling, Karnataka (AAAR Karnataka). However, the
AAAR Karnataka by an order dated 31.08.2020 inter alia held
that property rented out by the petitioner is a hostel building
which is more akin to sociable accommodation rather than
what is commonly understood as residential accommodation.
Therefore, the property rented out by the petitioner cannot
be termed as residential dwelling. It was further held that
benefit of exemption notification is available only if the
residential dwelling is used as a residence by the person who
has taken the same on rent / lease. In the result, the appeal
preferred by the petitioner was dismissed. In the aforesaid
factual background, this writ petition has been filed.
SUBMISSIONS OF PETITIONER:
6. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submitted
that the expression 'residential dwelling' has not been
defined anywhere in the Act. Therefore, its normal trade
parlance meaning has to be taken into account. It is
6
submitted that residential accommodation which is used for
long term stay has to be construed as residential dwelling. It
is further submitted that zoning regulations of Bengaluru
clearly provide that hostels are allowed