SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 35258

SRI SAYEED AHMED – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Respondent No.2 lodged FIR alleging that there was

dispute pending with her brother. Petitioner and others

restrained her and abused her in filthy language and

petitioner-accused No.1 threatened to deface by throwing

acid if he did not marry her. It was further alleged that the

accused distributed and pasted pamphlets on the darga by

making reckless allegation and thereby defamed her.

2.

It was further alleged that the petitioner-accused

have insulted her father. The police registered FIR for the

offences punishable under Section 354 (d), 292 A, 506, 149,

509 of IPC. The Police after investigation submitted charge

sheet before the learned magistrate. Learned Magistrate

after accepting charge sheet took cognizance for the

aforesaid offences. Taking exception of same, the accused

are before this court.

3

3.

Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits

that except making omnibus and general allegations there is

no specific allegation as against each of the accused as to

how and in what manner they abused her in filthy language

and also restrained her from proceeding further. Hence, in

the absence of any essential ingredients to constitute the

commission of aforesaid offence,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top