SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 53901

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

WRIT PETITION NO.8911 OF 2022 (GM-TEN)

BETWEEN:

1.

M.K. ROADLINES,

PROPRIETOR, D.P. NAGESHA,

S/O. PUTTEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

AMBEDKAR CIRCLE, MUDIGERE ROAD,

BELUR-573 115 (HASSAN DISTRICT)

2.

SRI. RANGANATHASWAMY TRANSPORT

PARTNER, PRAMOD CHAKRAVARTHY H.M.

S/O. MANJEGOWDA K.M

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

SHOP NO.25, GORUR ROAD, SANTEPET,

HASSAN-573 201.

3.

RAJKUMAR ROAD LINES,

PROPRIETOR, R. ARUN,

S/O. LATE D.C. RAJKUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

1ST MAIN ROAD, NEW MANDIPET,

TUMKUR-572 101.

&PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. M.S. RAJENDRA PRASAD, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI,

ADVOCATE)

2

AND:

1.

THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY,

FCS & CA DEPARTMENT,

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,

VIKAS SOUDHA,

BANGALORE-560 001.

2.

THE COMMISSIONER,

FCS & CA DEPARTMENT,

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,

NO.8, CUNNIGHAM ROAD,

SAHAKARA BHAVAN,

BANGALORE-560 052.

3.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

FCS & CA DEPARTMENT,

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,

HASSAN DISTRICT,

KARNATAKA-573 115.

&RESPONDENTS

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226

OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

R-2 NOTIFICATION DTD. 13.04.2022 (ANNX-A) CHANGING

THE CRUCIAL TENDER TERMS RELATE TO FIXED RATE

AFTER FINANCIAL BID OPENING IN THE RESPONDENTS

TENDER DTD. 10.12.2021 (ANNX-B) AS ARBITRARY,

DISCRIMINATORY, BIASED AND ENCROACHMENT UPON

THE

CONSTITUTIONAL

RIGHTS

OF

THE

PETITIONERS/TENDER PARTICIPANTS.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

3

1.

The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the

following reliefs;

<(i)

To issue a Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any

other writ, order or direction to quash the 2nd

Respondent9s

notification

dated

13/04/2022

(ANNEXURE-A) changing the crucial tender terms

related to <fixed rate= after financial bid opening in

the

Respondent9s

tender

No:FSA/E-PROC/

WHOLESALE/TENDER/01/2022-24

dated

10/12/2021

(ANNEXURE-B),

as

arbitrary,

discriminatory, biased and encroachment upon the

constitutional

rights

of

the

Petitioners/tender

participants.

(ii)

Consequently, to issue a Writ in the nature or order

or direction to 2nd Respondent to consider all the

three Petitioners9 tender bids (ANNEXURE:D &E &

F) respectively, in light of the tender terms stated

in

the

original

tender

document

22/12/2021

(ANNEXURE:A) Clause: 13 and Addendum issue on

22/12/2021 (ANNEXURE:B).

(iii)

To issue any other writ or direction or order the

Petitioners are found entitled to in the interest of

justice and equity.=

2.

After arguing the matter for some time, learned senior

counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court

to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file an appeal

under the provision of Section 16 of the Karnataka

Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999.

4

3.

Reserving such liberty, the petition stands dismissed as

withdrawn.

4.

Respondents are however restrained for a period of one

week from today from finalizing the tender. In the

event of no appeal being filed by 04.05.2022, the

interim order above passed shall automatically stands

vacated.

Sd/-

JUDGE

DH

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top