IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102727 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SHRI. BASAVRAJ @ BASU
S/O. RAJU AJJAPPAGOL
AGE. 20 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. HANDIGUND, TAL. RAIBAG,
DIST. BELAGAVI.
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH HARUGERI POLICE STATION,
R/BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENCH AT DHARWAD.
2.
SMT. YALLAWWA LAKKAPPA NEELANNAVAR
AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE WORK,
R/O. HANDIGUND, TAL. RAIBAG,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591317.
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V. MOGALI, HCGP FOR R1;
R2 - SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING
TO
ALLOW
THE
PETITION
AND
THE
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 102727 of 2022
PETITIONER/ACCUSED HEREIN MAY BE ENLARGED ON BAIL IN
FIR CRIME NO.131/2022 IN CONNECTION WITH HARUGERI
P.S. FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 341,
376(3) OF IPC AND SECTIONS 4 AND 6 OF THE POCSO ACT,
2012.
THIS
CRIMINAL
PETITION
COMING
ON
FOR
ORDERS
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for
brevity) seeking bail in Crime No.131/2022 of
Harugeri Police Station registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 341, 376(3) of The
Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the
8IPC9, for brevity), Sections 4 and 6 of Protection
of
Children
from
Sexual
Offence
Act,
2012
(hereinafter referred to as the 8POCSO Act9 for
brevity).
- 3 -
The case of the prosecution is that, the
victim girl has filed the complaint stating that she
is residing with her family in Handigund Village. It
is further stated that on 07.06.2022 when her
father and mother had been to work, she was
alone at her house at about 2.30 p.m. when she
went to fetch water near
the house of the
petitioner/accused,
at
that
time
the
petitioner/accused came from behind held the
complainant tightly, shut her mouth, took her to
his house and closed the door. At that time she
started hue and cry and the accused threatened
her not to cry or make noise and he is not going to
leave her and thereafter the petitioner/accused
took off her clothes and had sexual intercourse on
her, due to that she fell unconscious. Later at
6.00 p.m. she regained consciousness and she is
screaming and crying, at that time her mother and
neighbours came to the spot and opened the door
- 4 -
and took her to their house. Thereafter due to
fear she did not disclose the said incident to
anybody
and
after
discussion
they
filed
the
complaint belatedly. The said complaint came to
the registered in Crime No.131/2022 in Harugeri
Police Station for the offences punishable under
Sections 341, 376(3) of IPC and Sections 4 and 6
of POCSO Act. The petitioner/accused came to be
arrested on 15.07.2022 and he is in judicial
custody.
The
petitioner
filed
Criminal
Miscellaneous No.1051/2022 seeking bail and the
same came to be rejected by the Additional District
Judge FTSC-I, Belagavi by order dated 23.08.2022.
Therefore, the petitioner/accused is before this
Court seeking bail.
3.
Heard the arguments of learned counsel
appearing for petitioner and learned High Court
Government Pleader for respondent No.1-State.
- 5 -
Inspite of service of notice, respondent No.2
remained absent and unrepresented.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner
would contend that the alleged incident occurred
on 07.06.2022 and the complaint came to be filed
by the victim girl on 15.07.2022 and there is 38
days delay in filing the complaint and there is no
proper explanation for the delay in complaint. It is
his further submission that the victim girl in her
statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C.
has stated that she immediately went to the Police
Station for filing the complaint. The doctor who
examined the victim girl has noted that her hymen
is intact and there are no injuries over Labia
Majora and Labia Minora. It is his further
submission that the very fact of the hymen being
intact rules out the sexual intercourse by this
petitioner on the victim girl. It is his further
submission that it appears that there is a love
- 6 -
affair between the petitioner and the victim girl
and to break that affair, parents of the victim girl
have
got
filed
false
complaint
against
the
petitioner. As the charge sheet is filed, the
petitioner
is
not
required
for
custodial
interrogation. With this, he prayed to allow the
petition.
5.
Per
contra,
learned
High
Court
Government Pleader contends that the date of
birth of the victim girl as per her school records is
24.04.2008 and she is aged 15 years as on the
date of alleged offence. The doctor who examined
the victim girl has noted that her dental age is
between 15 to 16 years and skeletal age is more
than 16 years and less than 18 years. The victim
girl in her statement recorded under Section 164
of Cr.P.C. has specifically stated the acts of this
petitioner/accused forcibly taking her to his house
and having forcible sex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.