2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 48749
- 1 -
CRL.P No. 101167 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101167 OF 2022 (482)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. J SHANTHAMMA
W/O. LATE VIRUPANA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE,
R/O. MUSHTAGATTI VILLAGE,
BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT-583101.
2.
SRI J.RAVI S/O. LATE VIRUPANA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST
R/O. MUSHTAGATTI VILLAGE
BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT-583101.
3.
SMT. JAYALAKSHMI W/O. RAVI
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
R/O. MUSHTAGATTI VILLAGE,
BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT-583101.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI SATHISH.M.S., ADV.)
AND:
SMT. ROJA ALIAS DEEKSHITA
W/O. LATE J.SHARANAPPA
AND D/O. SIRIGERI BASAVARAJA,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE
R/O. SHANKARABANDA VILLAGE
BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT-583102.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI AMAREGOUDA, ADV.)
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 101167 of 2022
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.,
PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN CRIMINAL
MISC.NO.473/2021 PENDING BEFORE THIRD ADDITIONAL CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, BALLARI, AND TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 14.03.2022 PASSED BY THE THIRD ADDITIONAL CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, BALLARI IN CRIMINAL MISC.NO.473/2021
THEREBY ISSUING NOTICE TO THE PETITIONERS FILED UNDER
PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 1961
AND ALLOW THE ABOVE PETITION AND TO QUASH THE ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL MISC.NO.473/2021 PENDING ON THE
FILE OF THIRD ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BALLARI, IN
RESPECT OF PETITIONERS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
Parties are present before the Court. No amicable
settlement is reported. The petition is heard on merits, at
the stage of admission itself and perused the records.
This petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C. with the following prayer.
“WHEREFORE it is prayed that the Hon'ble
court may be pleased to hold, adjudge and
adjudicate that:
a. The Hon'ble court may be pleased to call for
entire records in Criminal Misc.No.473/2021
pending before Hon'ble Third Additional Civil
Judge & JMFC, Ballari.
- 3 -
b. To Quash the impugned Order dated 14-03-2022
passed by the learned Third Additional Civil
Judge & JMFC, Ballari in Crimina Misc No.
473/2021
thereby
issuing
notice
to
the
petitioners filed under Protection of Women
from Domestic Violence Act, 1961 and allow the
above petition in the interest of justice and
equity.
c. To Quash the entire petition bearing Criminal
Misc.No.473/202 pending on the file of Third
Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Ballar in respect
of petitioners in the interest of justice and
equity.
d. The Hon'ble court may grant such other relief or
reliefs as it deer fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the present petition in the
ends of justice and equity.”
Brief facts of the case are as under:
Respondent filed a petition under Sections 12, 18,
19, 20 read with Sections 22 and 23 of the Protection of
Women from Domestic Violence Act which was registered
in D.V.A.Cr.M.C.473/2021 on the file of III Additional Civil
Judge and JMFC, Court, Ballari.
- 4 -
Gist
of
the
petition
averments
reveal
that,
respondent married one Sharanappa who is the son of
petitioner No.1 and brother of petitioner No.2. Petitioner
No.1 being the mother in-law, 2nd and 3rd petitioners being
the brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the respondent, are
responsible for the domestic violence after the demise of
the husband of the respondent. She also stated that, she
is entitled for compensation from the petitioners in a sum
of Rs.50,000/- for monitory relief under Section 20,
Rs.9,00,000/- monitory relief under Section 22 of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
4.
The matter is under consideration before the
jurisdictional Court. When the matter stood thus, the
petitioners have approached this Court with the following
grounds to substantiate the afore said prayer.
The impugned order passed by the learned
Magistrate
is
contrary
to
law,
facts
and
materials placed on record.
It is submitted that the prosecution has
deliberately falsely implicated the entire family
- 5 -
members without ascertaining the truthfulness
of the allegations made in the complaint and
without verifying the presence of all the accused
persons on the alleged date of offence.
It is submitted that the petition before learned
Magistrate and the order sheet reveals that
learned Magistrate without considering the
report of the CDPO has directly issued notices to
the petitioners, which is in gross violation of
Section 12 of Protection of Women from
Domestic
Violence
Act.
The
Section
12
mandates that the Magistrate shall take into
consideration
the
domestic
incident
report
before passing any orders. The order sheet
clearly reveals that no such domestic incident
report has been considered by the learned
Magistrate before issuance of notice.
It is submitted that even reading the entire
complaint except making omnibus allegation no
specific overt act are forthcoming against
present petitioners.
In the entire complaint no date, month or year
of the alleged harassment is forthcoming which
by itself is sufficient to come to a conclusion
that the petitioners are unnecessarily dragged
with criminal texture.
- 6 -
It
is
further
submitted
that
the
learned
Magistrate has lost sight of the law laid down in
Preeti Gupta's case by the Apex court. Wherein
it is clearly held that courts should be very slow
in matrimonial matters so as to avoid false
implications of the relatives of the husband.
The respondent has filed suit for partition
against the peti