1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101678/2022
BETWEEN:
SHRI. SURAJ S/O. PUNDALIK KEDARICHE,
AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK,
R/O. PATIL GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI.
NOW AT 4TH CROSS, NAZAR CAMP, VADAGAON,
TQ: BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANAND DESAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
SHAHAPUR, POLICE STATION,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
DHARWAD.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V.MOGALI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL
IN CRIME NO.54/2021 (SC NO.196/2021) REGISTERED UNDER
SECTIONS 341 AND 302 OF IPC IN CONNECTION WITH
SHAHAPUR POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI, PENDING ON THE FILE
2
OF VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELGAVI SO
FAR AS PETITIONER/ACCUSED IS CONCERNED.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for brevity)
seeking bail in Crime No.54/2021 of Shahapura Police
Station, registered for the offences punishable under
Sections
341
and
302
of
The
Indian
Penal
Code
(hereinafter referred to as the 8IPC9, for brevity) (pending
in SC No.196/2021 on the file of the learned VIII
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi).
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, one Sri.
Sandeep Maruti Kundekar has lodged a compliant stating
that he is residing along with his wife and his sister Shilpa
who is married to one Manoj Hanamant Gavaskar and she
is residing in house of her husband at Goundwad. The
3
complainant use to do the work of preparing 8Tayat9 in his
house
and
his
mother9s
brother
by
name
Mahadev
(deceased) is residing along with his family members at
Ambewadi.
The
deceased
Mahadev
and
the
petitioner/accused were doing mason work under one
Mohan Laxman Khannukar. The said deceased Mahadev
used to drink liquor everyday and his wife used to quarrel
with him as such he used to sleep in the house of
complainant and used to visit Ambewadi whenever there
was no work. On that day on account of Mangayi fair the
deceased Mahadev was in the house of the complainant.
On that day at about 07:30 hours he went out and at
about 10:00 a.m. Mohan Laxman Khannukar informed over
phone to the mother of the complainant that somebody
murdered Mahadev near the rickshaw stand at Yallur Road
cross. Then the complainant along with his mother went
near Netaji Subhashchandra rickshaw stand and saw dead
body of Mahadev fallen, with injury over his neck. On
enquiring the public, it was revealed that at about 09:15
hours quarrel was taken place between the petitioner and
4
the deceased Mahadev over money transaction and at that
time the petitioner has assaulted Mahadev with radium
cutter blade over his neck and when Mahadev fell down
with heavy bleeding injury the petitioner ran away. The
said complaint came to be registered in Shahapur Police
Station in Crime No.54/2021 for the offence punishable
under Section 302 of IPC. The petitioner came to be
arrested on 02.08.2021 and he is in judicial custody. The
petitioner filed bail application in Crl. Misc. No.1386/2021
and the same came to be rejected by the learned VIII
Additional District & Sessions Judge, Belagavi by order
dated 21.12.2021. Therefore, the petitioner is before this
Court seeking bail.
3.
Heard the arguments of the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court
Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
4.
It would be the contention of the learned
counsel for the petitioner that the alleged incident has
occurred on 02.08.2021 at about 09:00 a.m. and the
5
complaint came to be filed at 01:00 p.m. on the same day
and there is delay in filing the complaint. The alleged
eyewitnesses stated in the charge sheet are all relatives
of the deceased. There is no motive and the alleged
incident has occurred in a sudden quarrel between the
deceased
and
the
petitioner/accused.
The
petitioner/accused is in judicial custody since the day he
was arrested and as charge sheet is filed, he is not
required for any custodial interrogation. With this, he
prayed for allowing the petition.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader would contend that, the offences alleged against
the petitioner are heinous offences punishable with death
or imprisonment for life. CW-4 to 10 are eyewitnesses to
the
incident
who
have
seen
the
petitioner/accused
assaulting the deceased with radium cutter blade on the
neck
of
the
deceased.
The
statement
of
these
eyewitnesses has also been recorded under Section 164 of
Cr.P.C.
The
Doctor
who
conducted
post
mortem
6
examination over the dead body of the deceased has given
a final opinion that the death has occurred due to
hamorrhagic shock as a result of transection of vessels of
neck caused by sharp cutting
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.