KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
B A PUSHPAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
SMT SARALA – Respondent
RFA 172/2008
- -
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2008
C/W
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 174 OF 2008
IN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2008
BETWEEN:
1.
B A PUSHPAVATHI
W/O.N.RAMACHANDRA,
AGED 51 YEARS,
R/O. NO.18/26
SOUTH END CROSS ROAD
BASAVANAGUDI
BANGALORE-560004
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S R HEGDE HUDLAMANE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT SARALA
W/O.H.M.NAGENDRAPPA
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS
1(A) GIRISH BABU
S/O. LATE H .M. NAGENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
1(B) MAHESH
S/O. LATE H.M. NAGENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
- -
2
1(C) SUDESH
S/O. H.M.NAGENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT NO.1353
5TH CROSS, ASHOK NAGAR
BSK 1ST STAGE
BENGALURU 560050
2
SRI. SUDESHRAJ B N
S/O. LATE H.M.NAGENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/O. NO.1353/16/2, 5TH CROSS
ASHOKNAGAR, B.S.K.IST STAGE
BANGALORE-560 050
3
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY IS COMMISSIONER
5TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST
GUTTAHALLI, BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G LAKSHMEESH RAO , ADVOCATE FOR R3;
MS. DIVYA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. T.SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1(C);
R1(A) AND R1(B) ARE SERVED;
R2 IS SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF THE CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DT. 20.12.2007 PASSED IN OS
4145/1993 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE,
BANGALORE,
(CCH-28)
DISMISSING
THE
SUIT
FOR
DECLARATION OF TITLE, INJUNCTION AND POSSESSION.
- -
3
IN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 174 OF 2008
BETWEEN:
1.
B A PUSHPAVATHI
W/O.N.RAMACHANDRA,
AGED 51 YEARS,
R/O. 61, 6TH MAIN ROAD
A.P.K. ROAD, 2ND BLOCK
THYAGARAJANAGAR
BANGALORE-28
REPRESENTED BY HER
P.A.HOLDER R.MUKUNDA
S/O. SRI. RAJU
R/O. NO.49-A, MANUVANA
VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560 010
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S R HEGDE HUDLAMANE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT SARALA
W/O.H.M.NAGENDRAPPA
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS
1(A) GIRISH BABU
S/O. LATE H .M. NAGENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
1(B) MAHESH
S/O. LATE H.M. NAGENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
1(C) SUDESH
S/O. H.M.NAGENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT NO.1353
5TH CROSS, ASHOK NAGAR
- -
4
BSK 1ST STAGE
BENGALURU 560050
2
SRI. SUDESHRAJ B N
S/O. LATE H.M.NAGENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/O. NO.1353/16/2, 5TH CROSS
ASHOKNAGAR, B.S.K.IST STAGE
BANGALORE-560 050
…RESPONDENTS
(BY MS. DIVYA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. T.SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1(C);
R1(A), R1(B) AND R2 ARE SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF THE CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DT. 20.12.2007 PASSED IN OS
5510/1993 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE,
BANGALORE, (CCH-28).
THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COMMON ORDER
Having regard to the fact that the layout came to be
formed and some of the site owners who are purchasers of
the revenue sites before the Bengaluru Development
Authority (BDA) took over the entire land in Sy.No.13/4 of
Sunkanahalli
Village
and
formed
the
layout
called
'Banashankari I Stage, II Block', the applications filed by
the revenue site owner who was the defendant in the suit
- -
5
need to be considered by the BDA. So also, necessity has
arisen to locate and identify the site that has been allotted
to the appellant and the site that has been purchased by
the defendant in the trial Court. All these aspects require
recording
of
further
evidence
and
also
afford
an
opportunity for the parties to place additional oral and
documentary evidence on record in order to ascertain the
identity of the property as well.
Hence, this Court is of the considered opinion that
the impugned orders needs to be set aside and the
matters be remitted to the trial Court fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.