SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 56210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF JULY, 2022

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA

AND

THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA

MFA NO. 3703/2021 (MV-D)

C/W

MFA NO. 2753/2021 (MV-D)

IN MFA NO.3703/2021

BETWEEN :

1.

SRI.SUJIT KUMAR SEN

S/O LATE HARAN CHANDRA SEN

AGED 56 YEARS

2.

SMT. PUSPA RANI SEN

W/O LATE HARAN CHANDRA SEN

AGED 78 YEARS

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT

NO.700/1, SARAT CHATARJEE ROAD

SHIBPUR, HAORA CORPORATION

HAORA, WEST BENGAL -711 102

2ND PETITIONER PREVIOUSLY

R/AT: NO.32, SOUTH BAKSARA

VILLAGE ROAD, HAORA CORPORATION

BAKSARA, HAORA

WEST BENGAL - 711 110

...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. PRAKASH M.H. ADVOCATE)

- 2 -

AND :

1.

ICICI LOMBARD GEN INS CO LTD

NO.121, THE ESTATE BUILDING

9TH FLOOR, DICKENSON ROAD

BANGALORE - 560 001

REP BY ITS MANAGER.

2.

SRI.AABHARANAM

S/O KOTIM REDDY ANITHA

AGE: MAJOR

R/AT FLAT NO.5-A

DOYAN HABITAT APPT

SRINAGAR COLONY

HYDRABAD, TELANGANA - 500 013.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. B.C. SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;

NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W)

THIS MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.02.09.2020 PASSED IN MVC

NO.2532/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL JUDGE

AND ACMM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MACT, SCCH-6,

BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR

COMPENSATION SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

IN MFA NO.2753/2021

BETWEEN :

M/S ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL

INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

REGIONAL OFFICE

NO.121, THE ESTATE BUILDING

9TH FLOOR, DICKENSON ROAD

M.G. ROAD, BANGALORE -01

...APPELLANT

(BY SRI. B.C. SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE)

- 3 -

AND :

1.

SUJIT KUMAR SEN

S/O LATE HARAN CHANDRA SEN

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

2.

PUSHPA RANI SEN

W/O LATE HARAN CHANDRA SEN

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT

NO.700/1, SARAT CHATARJEE ROAD

SHIBPURM, HAORA CORPORATION

HAORA, WEST BENGAL 711 102.

3.

AABRHRANAM

S/O KOTIM REDDY ANITHA

AGE MAJOR

R/AT FLAT NO.5-A

DOYAN HABITAT APPT

SRINAGAR COLONY

HYDRABAD, TELANGANA - 500 013.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. PRAKASH.M.H, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;

NOTICE TO R3 IS D/W, V/O/DATED 01.07.2022)

THIS MFA FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED. 02.09.2020, PASSED IN MVC

NO.2532/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE IV-ADDITIONAL JUDGE

AND ACMM., COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU (SCCH-

6), AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.54,02,000/- WITH

INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 9 PERCENT P.A., FROM THE DATE

OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENT.

THESE MFA’s COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

B.VEERAPPA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:

- 4 -

The appeal in MFA No.3703/2021 is filed by the

unfortunate father and grand father of the deceased Sayandeep

sen for enhancement of compensation and MFA No.2753/2021 is

filed by the insurance company for reduction of compensation.

Both these appeals are filed against the impugned judgment and

award dated 02.09.2020 passed in MVC No.2532/2018 on the

file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru

awarding total compensation of Rs.54,02,000/- with interest at

9% p.a. from the date of the petition till the date of realization.

2.

It is the case of the claimants that on 30.03.2018 at

about 1.50 p.m the deceased Sayandeep sen was traveling in a

Ford Eco sport car bearing registration No.AP-09-CT-0300 from

Biligirangana Betta towards Bengaluru and reached near

Thungani gate, Kanakapura-Bengaluru Main Road, NH-209 road,

Kanakapura Taluk, Ramangara District. At that time, the driver

of the said car without observing any traffic rules and regulations

has driven with rash and negligent manner endangering to

human life, dashed against the road side stone and toppled the

- 5 -

car, as a result of which the accident occurred and the deceased

sustained severe injuries all over the body and was succumbed

to fatal injuries on spot. He was shifted to Kanakapura

Government Hospital, wherein, the doctor was declared that

brought dead and after postmortem examination, the dead body

was handed over to the claimants. Thereafter, the claimants

took the dead body to their residence Haora, West Bengal and

conducted funeral and obsequies ceremonies by incurring

expenses of Rs.3,00,000/- including transportation charges.

2.

It is the further case of the claimants that on account

of sudden and sad demise of the deceased in the said accident,

the claimants have undergone deep mental shock, pain and

suffering. It is further case that prior to the accident, the

deceased was hale and healthy, studying B.B.A., (Finance and

International

business)

final

year

at

Christ

University,

Bannerghatta Road Campus, Bannerghatta Road, Hulimavu,

Bengaluru and was distinction student in the college. The

deceased was appointed as a trainee-business development at

Samast Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in campus selection conducted by

- 6 -

the Christ College, wherein, the salary was fixed at Rs.45,000/-

per month and Rs.5,28,000/- as annual salary. The deceased

also received employment offer letter dated 11.03.2018 as full

time permanent employee. The deceased had bright future and

prospects in the aforesaid company and he contributed his entire

income to maintain his family members. The jurisdiction police

have registered a criminal case against the driver of the Ford Eco

sport car bearing registration No.AP-09-CT-0300 under Sections

279, 338 and 304(A) of IPC. The 1st respondent being the owner

of offending vehicle and 2nd respondent being the insurer, both

the respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay

compensation to the claimants. Hence, the claimants have

sought for compensation of Rs.80,00,000/- with cost and

interest.

3.

In response to the notice, the respondent No.1 has

remained absent and was placed exparte. Respondent No.2-

insurance company filed the written statement denying the

averments made in the claim petition and contended that the

driver of the car bearing registration No.AP-09-CT-0300 was not

- 7 -

holding valid and effective driving license on the date of the

accident and was not qualified for holding or obtaining such

driving license and further not satisfied the requirements of the

Rule 3 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. The respondent

No.1 knowing fully well that the driver did not possess valid and

effective driving license and willfully entrusted the vehicle to the

said driver. Thereby, the owner of the vehicle committed breach

of terms and conditions of the policy, hence, 2nd respondent is

not liable to pay compensation.

4.

Based on the aforesaid pleadings, the Tribunal

framed the following issues:

"1.

Whe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top