D MADEGOWDA S/O LATE DODDATHAMMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
These two writ petitions filed as public interest
litigations are clubbed, heard together and disposed of by
this common order having regard to the similitude of
facts involved in the cases and the prayers sought for in
the writ petitions.
2. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing
for the parties and perused the material on record.
10
3. The petitioners in W.P.No.10948/2010 are all
residents of Mysuru City having keen interest in
protecting the natural habitat at Mysuru and protect its
environment,
whereas
petitioner
no.1
in
W.P.No.4776/2009 is a registered Association of the
Industrialists of Mysuru and petitioner no.2 is a social
activist having keen interest in protection of lakes in
Mysuru.
4. It is the common grievance of all the petitioners
in these writ petitions that the tank bed area of Hebbal
lake within the limits of Koorgalli Grama Panchayath,
Mysuru Taluk and Bommenahalli lake within the limits of
Nagavala Grama Panchayath, Mysuru Taluk, have been
encroached and industrial activities are carried on within
the tank bed area. It is the specific grievance of the
petitioners that land bearing Sy. No.104 measuring 19
acres 10 guntas which is within the tank bed area of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.