SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, – Respondent


The learned counsel representing the respective parties to

the lis in unison submit that the issue stands covered by the

judgment

of

the

co-ordinate

Bench

of

this

Court

in

W.P.No.102611/2016 (GM-RES), disposed off on 17.3.2017,

wherein the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, on an identical

issue, has held as follows:

2.

This petition is filed seeking quashing of the

order and findings of the learned Senior Civil Judge

& JMFC, Mudhol in LAC No. 202/2010 dated

08.03.2016 wherein the learned magistrate has

directed the Administrative Sheristedar of his Court

to lodge a complaint against the petitioner for the

offences punishable u/S 193, 196, 465, 468 and

471 of IPC.

3.

The

learned

counsel

for

the

petitioner

brought to the notice of this Court a judgment of

the Apex Court in the case of Sharad Pawar V.

Jagmohan Dalmiya and Others reported in (2010)

15 SCC 290 wherein the Apex Court dealing u/S

195 and 340 of Cr.P.C. have set some guidelines

referring to Sec. 340 of Cr.P.C. The procedure to

be followed by the Civil Courts while referring the

complaint to the Criminal Courts for the offences

punishable u/S 193, 196, 465, 468 and 471 of IPC.

This Court also taking into consideration the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top