This petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.18/2009 on

the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge & CJM,

Davanagere (for short, 8the civil Court9), and she has

impugned the civil Court9s orders dated 13.06.2016. The

civil Court by its two orders of even date has rejected the

petitioner9s two applications (I.A.No.24 and I.A.No.26). The

petitioner9s application (I.A.No.24) under Section 151 of

CPC is for correction of the year that is stated by the

petitioner

in

her

cross-examination,

and

the

other

application (I.A.No.26) is for amendment of the plaint under

Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of CPC to

substitute description of the properties in the plaint and to

include certain properties mentioned in the application.

2.

The petitioner9s case is that even in her cross-

examination she has stated that the subject property,

which bears Door No.1601/30, is purchased during the

year 2002 but while recording the cross-examination, the

civil Court by an inadvertent error has recorded that she

6

admits to the purchase of the said property in the year

2009; as such, the application is filed for correction of this

inadvertent error. This application is opposed by some of

the responde