IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102642 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SHRI SADASHIV S/O. ANNAPPA NAVI,
AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: BARBER,
R/O. ASANGI, TQ. RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI,
DIST: BAGALKOTE, PIN CODE-587311.
&PETITIONER
(BY SHRI SANJAY S. KATAGERI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH BANAHATTI POLICE STATION,
(BANAHATTI CIRCLE), BAGALKOTE,
R/BY ADDL. S.P.P.,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH,
DHARWAD, PIN CODE-580011.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI PRASHANTH V.MOGALI., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439
OF
CR.P.C.,
SEEKING
TO
ENLARGE
THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
ON
REGULAR
BAIL
IN
CRIME
NO.50/2022 OF BANAHATTI POLICE STATION REGISTERED
FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 302 OF
IPC, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 102642 of 2022
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by sole accused under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 (hereinafter referred to as 8Cr.P.C.9, for
brevity) seeking bail in Crime No.50/2022 of
Banahatti Police Station registered for the offences
punishable under Section 302 of The Indian Penal
Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 8IPC9, for
brevity) pending in Sessions Case No.5046/2022
on the file of learned I-Additional District and
Sessions Judge, Bagalkote sitting at Jamakhandi.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, on
26.05.2022
at
about
2:00
p.m,
when
the
petitioner/accused was working as haircutter in the
Hair Cutting Salon by name <Prajwal Gents Parlor=,
at that time, the deceased Sagar Sinappa Awati
- 3 -
came along with his friends and started teasing the
petitioner by stating that, he has not done proper
hair cutting on the previous day and as such, he
will not make any payment for the colour hair dye
and he has to do it free of cost. It is further stated
that the deceased used to tease the petitioner in
the said fashion even on earlier occasion. At that
time, the petitioner has stated that he will teach a
lesson to the deceased. It is further stated that
the deceased and his friends were sitting in the
said hair cutting shop on 26.05.2022 and the
deceased teased once again in the said fashion.
The
deceased
has
stated
to
have
told
the
petitioner to apply the hair dye colour and for the
same, the deceased has told that he will not pay
the amount for the same since he had not done
hair cutting properly on the earlier occasion. For
this, the petitioner told him to pay Rs.20/- for hair
dye colour and the deceased told that he will not
- 4 -
pay any extra amount and it should be done in the
amount already paid on the previous occasion. For
the said statement, the petitioner got angry and
with an intention to kill the deceased Sagar took
the scissor kept on the table at the said shop and
assaulted him with scissor on his right hand and
chest and the said Sagar has sustained grievous
injury and he was taken to Banahatti Government
Hospital and when he was taking to Jamakhandi
Government hospital, the deceased succumbed to
the said injuries on the way. The mother of the
victim come and filed complaint and the same
came to be registered in Crime No.50/2022 of
Banahatti Police Station against this petitioner for
the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC.
The petitioner/accused came to be arrested on
27.05.2022 and he is in judicial custody. The
petitioner/accused
filed
bail
application
in
S.C.No.5043/2022 seeking bail and the same came
- 5 -
to be rejected by learned I-Additional District and
Sessions Judge, Bagalakote, sitting at Jamakhandi
by
order
dated
26.08.2022.
Therefore,
the
petitioner/accused is before this Court seeking
bail.
3.
Heard the arguments of learned counsel
appearing for petitioner and learned High Court
Government Pleader for respondent/State.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would
contend that, as the deceased used to tease the
petitioner
on
each
and
every
occasion,
the
petitioner under the heat of anger took the scissor
kept in the salon and assaulted with it on the chest
of the deceased. The deceased succumbed to the
said injury while on the way to hospital. It is his
further submission that the said alleged incident
has taken place in a sudden and grave provocation
- 6 -
attracting offence under Section 304 Part-II of IPC.
It is his further submission that the petitioner is
aged 19 years and as the charge-sheet is filed, he
is not required for custodial interrogation. With
this, he prayed to allow the petition.
5.
Per
contra,
learned
High
Court
Government
Pleader
would
contend
that,
the
offence alleged against the petitioner is heinous
offence punishable with death or imprisonment for
life. There is a quarrel between the petitioner and
the accused at the time of incident and the
petitioner with an intention to kill the deceased
took the scissor and assaulted with it on the chest
and caused i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.