2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 48306
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE Mr. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.101701/2022
BETWEEN :
BHAVANA
D/O LATE LAXMAN BANGALORE
AGE:24 YEARS, OCC:PRIVATE JOB
R/O GANGADHAR NAGAR
SETTLEMENT 4TH CROSS, HUBLI
DIST: DHARWAD 3 580 020.
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI SRINIVAS B NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND :
THE STATE OF KARANTAKA
REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
THROUGH HUBLI TOWN POLICE STATION
HUBLI 3 580 011.
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI PRAVEEN UPPAR, HCGP)
---
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439(1)(b) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION
2
AND MODIFY THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2021 IN RESPECT OF
APPEARANCE BEFORE THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER WITHIN
15
DAYS
AND
EXECUTE
BOND
AND
MARKING
OF
ATTENDANCE ON EVERY SUNDAY FOR A PERIOD OF TWO
MONTHS BY EXTENDING TIME OF 15 DAYS FOR APPEARANCE
BEFORE INVESTIGATION OFFICER AND RELAXATION OF
MARKING THE ATTENDANCE ON EVERY SUNDAY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH
HEARING/VIDEO
CONFERENCE
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
PASSED THE FOLLOWING;
The petitioner/accused No.6 has filed this petition
under Section 439(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. seeking modification
of the order dated 09.12.2021 passed in Criminal Petition
No.102291/2021 in respect of appearance before the
investigating officer within 15 days and execute bond and
marking of attendance on every Sunday for a period of
two months by extending time of 15 days for appearance
before investigation officer and relaxation of marking
attendance on every Sunday.
2.
The petitioner/accused No.6 had filed Criminal
Petition No.102291/2021 under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
3
seeking anticipatory bail in Hubballi Town Police Station
in Crime No.103/2021 for the offence punishable under
Section 20(b) (ii) of NDPS Act, 1985. This Court vide
order dated 09.12.2021 has allowed the said petition
subject to compliance of the following conditions:
(i)
The
petitioner/accused
No.6
shall
execute a personal bond for a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only)
with one surety for the likesum to the
satisfaction
of
the
Investigating
Officer/jurisdictional Court.
(ii)
The
petitioner/accused
No.6
shall
voluntarily
appear
before
the
Investigating Officer within fifteen days
from this day and execute personal
bond.
(iii)
The petitioner/accused No.6 shall remain
present
before
the
police
station
concerned on every Sunday between
10:00am and 2.00pm and mark her
presence for a period of two months or
4
till filing of the final report, whichever is
earlier.
(iv)
The petitioner/accused No.6 shall co-
operate in the investigation and make
herself
available
for
interrogation
whenever required.
(v)
The petitioner/accused No.6 shall not
directly
or
indirectly
make
any
inducement, threat or promise to any
witness acquainted with the facts of the
case so as to dissuade him from
disclosing such facts to the Court or to
any Police Officer.
(vi)
The petitioner/accused No.6 shall not
obstruct
or
hamper
the
police
investigation and not to play mischief
with the evidence collected or yet to be
collected by the police.
3.
The petitioner did not comply condition Nos.2, 3
and 4. The petitioner has mentioned in the petition that
she was working at Delhi, unable to undertake journey to
Hubli and after return she was unable to furnish the surety,
5
to mark her attendance and the time fixed by this Court has
expired.
4.
He further contended that the petitioner is
orphan lady and is unable to furnish the surety in time and
due to non furnishing of surety within time, she was not
able to appear before the investigating officer within 15
days.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
for the aforesaid reasons, the petitioner could not be able to
appear before the investigating officer and could not furnish
the surety and not able to comply the conditions imposed
by this Court.
6.
It is further submitted that the petitioner is
ready to furnish surety and co-operate with investigating
officer. It is his further submission that the investigating
officer has already filed charge sheet and the case is
6
registered in Special case No.103/2021 and it is pending
before the Prl.District Judge and Special Judge, Dharwad.
7.
Learned HCGP would contend that the petitioner
has no respect to the Court orders and she has failed to
comply with the conditions imposed by this Court and also
failed to co-operate with the investigating officer in
investigation. Therefore, she is not entitled for relief as
sought for in the petition.
8.
The Petitioner is orphan lady earlier residing in
Delhi and she was unable to furnish the surety after her
return.
Accepting the said grounds, the prayer sought by
the petitioner can be considered.
Hence, the following:
ORDER
1.
The petition filed under Section 439(1)(b) of
Cr.P.C. is allowed.
7
2.
The time imposed in condition No.2 is extended
by 15 days from today.
3.
The petitioner/accused No.6 is directed to abide
by condition No.1, 5 and 6.
4.
The petitioner/accused No.6 shall co-operate
with the investigating officer for any further
investig