- 1 -
CRL.P No. 102312 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102312 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SHRI APPASAHEB BALGAUD TODKAR @PATIL
AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. DARGA GALLI, TQ. SOLLAPUR VILLAGE,
TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI,
PIN-591313.
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.M.MUCHHANDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE POLICE INSPECTOR SANKESHWAR,
DIST. BELAGAVI, PIN-591314.
R/BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
AT: DHARWAD BENCH, PIN-580011.
2.
SHRI SADASHIV BHIMU MASTI,
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,
R/O. LAXMI GALLI, SOLLAPUR VILLAGE,
TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI,
PIN-591213.
& RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V.MOGALI, HCGP FOR R1;
R2 SERVED)
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 102312 of 2022
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO THAT THE PETITION BE
ALLOWED
AND
THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
MAY
BE
ENLARGED ON REGULAR BAIL IN SPL.CASE NO.246/2021,
SANKESHWAR P.S. CRIME NO.153/2021 UNDER SECTIONS
366(A),
376(2)(J),
376(2)(L)
OF
IPC
AND
UNDER
SECTIONS 4 AND 5(K) AND 6 OF POCSO ACT PENDING ON
THE FILE OF LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-1, BELAGAVI.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused
under Section 439 of The Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the
8Cr.P.C.9, for brevity) seeking bail in Crime
No.153/2021 of Sankeshwar Police Station,
registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 366(A), 376(2)(J) and 376(2)(L) of
The Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to
as the 8IPC9, for brevity) and under Sections 4,
- 3 -
5(K) & 6 of the Protection of Children from
Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred to as
the 8POCSO Act9, for brevity).
The case of the prosecution is that,
one Sadashiv Masti has filed complaint stating
that the victim girl is his daughter and she is
aged 17 years and she is mentally retarded and
he is having a son. It is further stated that on
01.09.2021 at about 11 O9clock his mentally
retarded daughter/victim girl and his son went
on a cycle to his relatives house for playing. It
is at about 4:00 p.m., his neighbour Jafar
Kulkarni
informed
him
that
this
petitioner/accused took both mentally retarded
victim girl and his son on his motorcycle to his
field. Immediately the complainant and Jafar
went to the field and saw his son sitting near
the well and on enquiry he told them that his
sister has been taken into sugarcane field. The
- 4 -
complainant and Jafar saw that the petitioner
has removed his clothes and also the under
garments of the victim girl. After seeing the
complainant, the petitioner took his clothes and
ran away and the same came to be registered
in Crime No.153/2021 of Sankeshwar Police
Station
for
the
offences
punishable
under
Sections 354(A) and 354(B) of IPC and under
Sections 8 and 12 of POCSO Act. The petitioner
came
to
be
arrested
on
03.09.2021.
The
Investigating Officer after investigation has
filed charge sheet and now the case is pending
in
S.C.No.246/2021.
The
petitioner
filed
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1395/2021 seeking
bail and the same came to be rejected by the
learned III Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Belagavi by order dated 24.12.2021.
Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court
seeking bail.
- 5 -
3.
Heard the arguments of the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent No.1-State. Respondent No.2 who
was
present
on
the
previous
date
has
submitted
that,
he
has
no
objection
for
granting bail to the petitioner.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner
would contend that, in the compliant and in the
further
statement
of
complainant
dated
02.09.2021 there is no allegation of sexual
intercourse by the petitioner on the victim girl
but it is alleged in further statement of the
complainant dated 05.09.2021. Even mother of
the victim girl in her statement has not made
any allegation of sexual intercourse. In the
MLC, in the history column, it is mentioned that
the petitioner tried to sexually assault the
victim girl. The victim girl who was admitted to
- 6 -
hospital on 02.09.2021 has been discharged on
03.09.2021 and the Doctor who examined the
victim girl has stated that vaginal smear for
spermatozoa 3 Negative, hymen not intact
(posterior old tear) and no fresh injuries noted.
The age of the victim girl as per Radiological
examination is more than 20 years and as per
Dental examination it is between 15 to 16
years. He has further opined that the lady is
used for an act like that of sexual intercourse.
The date of birth of the victim girl as per her
school records is 18.03.2004 and she was aged
17 years 6 months as on the date of the
alleged
offence.
The
victim
girl
in
her
statement
recorded
under
Section
164
of
Cr.P.C., has not stated any sexual intercourse
but she has only stated that the petitioner
caused pain on her private part. Even the
father of the victim girl has not stated any
- 7 -
allegation
of
sexual
intercourse
by
this
petitioner on his daughter in his statement
recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. The
brother of the victim girl who was present near
the spot, in his statement recorded under
Sectio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.