2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 61879
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9450/2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. THAHA UMMER
S/O UMMAR
AGED 38 YEARS
RESIDING AT PADIKKA MANNI HOUSE
KOOTILANGADI, MALAPPURAM
KERALA
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIVEK .S. REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. SHAIK ISMAIL ZABIULLA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
UNION OF INDIA
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
BANGALORE ZONAL UNIT
NO.7/1-2, PRIYANK VILAS,
RAMANNA GARDEN, BAGLUR MAIN ROAD
KATTIGENAHALLI, YELAHANKA
BENGALURU-560 063 ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BALAKRISHNA. M.R., CGSC)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439 OF CR.P.C, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER
ON BAIL IN CR.NO.48/1/11/2022/BZU REGISTERED BY
NCB POLICE, BENGALURU ZONAL UNIT, BENGALURU FOR
THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 8(c) R/W 22(b), 23(c), 27A,
28 AND 29 OF N.D.P.S. ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF
XXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
AND SPECIAL JUDGE(NDPS), CCH-33, BENGALURU.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD
AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 29.10.2022, COMING
ON FOR 8PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER9 THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Key Points: - (!) (!) (!) The document notes Clonazepam is a banned narcotic drug under the NDPS Act and that the parcel was opened in presence of witnesses, with drugs found and weighed. (!) (!) (!) - (!) (!) The court discusses the mandate of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, stating offences are cognizable and non-bailable, and addresses the burden on the petitioner to disprove the case, concluding bail at this stage is not warranted. (!) (!) (!) - (!) (!) The court concludes there is no material evidence to establish innocence and accordingly dismisses the bail petition. (!) (!)
What is the bail jurisdiction under NDPS Act in this case?
What is the court's stance on Standing Order compliance and sample quantity for testing?
What are the grounds for dismissing the bail petition in this NDPS case?
The petitioner/Accused No.1 has filed this
petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for enlarging
him on bail in Narcotic Control Bureau (for short,
8NCB9) Crime No.48/1/11/2022/BZU registered by
NCB,
Bengaluru
Zonal
Unit,
for
the
offences
punishable under Sections 8(c) read with Sections
22(b), 23(c), 27-A, 28 & 29 of Narcotic Drugs
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 8NDPS
Act9), pending on the file of XXXIII Additional City
Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS)
CCH-33, Bengaluru.
2.
The brief factual matrix leading to the case
are that, on 07.05.2022 a reliable information was
received by complainant, regarding the suspicious
parcel having Way Bill No, 1826193810 laying at DHL
Express (India) Pvt. Ltd., Express Cargo Terminal, No.
3
C 19, North Cargo Road, Kempegowda International
Airport, Bengaluru 3 560 300 and it was suspected to
be containing Clonazepam Tablets, which is covered
under NDPS Act.
Then
after
taking
necessary
instructions in writing from the superintendent of NCB
at Bengaluru Zonal Unit, the Investigating Officer
along with his team reached the DHL Express (India)
Pvt. Ltd., Express Cargo Terminal No.C-19, North
Cargo
Road,
Kempegowda
International
Airport,
Bengaluru and a parcel was found to be booked by
Sri. Ajmal Nanath Valiyatt, son of Haris Nanath
Valiyatt, resident of Nanath valiyatt House, Melmuri,
Malappuram, Kerala and was addressed to one Sri
Zainul Abid Mannan Paramban, Al Maddena Sweets,
Halaga Vegitables Market, Near Shamaisi Warehouse,
PO Box Number 6641, Jeddh, K.S.A Jeddah, Saudi,
Arabia. Then after following the procedures as per
law,
357
grams
of
Clonazepam
Tablets
(a
psychotropic substance under the provision of NDPS
Act) was seized from that parcel from the said Cargo
4
and seizure mahazar was also drawn at the spot on
07.05.2022. It is further alleged that four summons
have been issued to the present petitioner/Accused
No.1 for his appearance for interrogation and
subsequently, the present petitioner/accused was
arrested on 25.08.2022 and after interrogation, he
was produced before the Court and then he was
remanded to judicial custody.
3.
The petitioner has approached the learned
Sessions Judge/Special Judge seeking regular bail in
Criminal Misc. No.8757/2022 and that bail petition
came to be rejected. Hence, he is before this Court.
4.
Heard the arguments advanced by Sri.
Vivek S. Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the
petitioner/Accused No.1 and Sri. M.R. Balakrishna,
the Central Government Standing Counsel ( 8CGSC9
for short9) for the Respondent-NCB. Perused the
records.
5
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused
No.1 would contend that the petitioner is innocent
and he is working as a medical items supplier, but not
an exporter. He would also contend that, Rivotril-2
Tables of 2244 were seized when it is alleged that
they were being transported in postal cover. It is
asserted that, there were six bottles as per case of
prosecution and all the tablets were mixed together
and common sample was taken by the raiding party
and though they had taken DD Kits, no instant test
was conducted at the spot. He would also contend
that, the test report would disclose that the sample
was weighing 4.2 grams. But, as per the Standing
Order, minimum 5 grams were required to be taken
as sample for testing and it is violation of the
Standing Order. He would also contend that,
percentage of the Clonazepam Tablets is also not
stated in the report and Rivotril-2 tables are not
banned and what is banned is Clonazepam Tablets.
He would contend that there is no proper drawing of
6
samples and results are also doubtful and when there
is no proper procedure being followed as laid down in
the Standing Order, the petitioner is entitled for bail.
Further, in support of his contention he has placed a
decision of Telengana High Court in Criminal
Petition No.4428/2022 [Baba Sow Chandekar
and Another Vs. The State of Telangala].
6.
Per contra, the learned CGSC for the
re