SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 51362

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


DATED

19.04.2021 PASSED BY THE XXIV ACMM, BANGALORE IN

C.C.NO.10291/2021 TAKING COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCE

ALLEGEDLY COMMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER THE

LEGAL METROLOGY ACT, 2009, R/W THE LEGAL METROLOGY

(PACKAGED COMMODITIES) RULES, 2011, AND ALL FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS IN THE SAID CASE (ANNEXURE-

A); B. QAUSHING THE COMPLAINT IN C.C.NO.10291/2021

FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE XXIV ACMM,

BANGALORE ON 05.03.2021 AND ALL THE PROCEEDINGS

INITIATED IN THE SAID CASE PURSUANT TO THE COMPLAINT

(ANNEXURE-B).

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The

petitioners/accused

to

10

in

C.C.No.10291/2021 called in question the proceedings

5

so instituted for the offence punishable under the

Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (`Act’ for short) and the

Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011.

2. Heard learned Senior counsel Sri.Sandesh J.

Chouta along with Sri.Sandeep Huilgol, learned

counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned

HCGP appearing for the State.

3. Brief facts leading to filing of the present case

as presented by the prosecution are as follows:

The allegation against the petitioner is that a

publication on 10.09

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top